^Supporting HItler, bailling out to leave your crewmen to die, desertion from the National Guard, Silverado Savings and Loan, WMDs (for revenge, Halliburton and your buddy), don’t dig to deep under the bush pile for sleaze. (don’t have to)
Shrillary used insider trading to make bundles in Whitewater, covered up the reason our Ambassador to Libya and 3 other Americans were murdered, purposely concealed and then covered up all her official communications while Secratary of State and now is using her “Foundation” to solicit money and return favors to foreign governments.I’m sure I missed a few, but do you really need any other reason not to vote for the MOST CORRUPT person to ever run for President?
I just love how all of you keep arguing whether Killary is better or worse than Bush. The fact that she’s utter, pure evil isn’t important; what’s important is whether she’s more or less utterly pure evil than the other utterly pure evil guy.
She’s a perfect replacement for President Obama. The Republicans can spend the next eight years vilifying and investigating her while they continue to do nothing in Congress. Hey they might even extend the congressional vacations and make them year round only showing up in Washington on ceremonial occasions.
Hillary’s been dealing with the same set of hysterical right-wing lies for decades, and hasn’t broken a sweat yet. Whitewater was the biggest and gaudiest of a series of dry holes that the GOP keeps going back and peeking at, just in case a gusher has decided to come in since the last time they looked, fifteen minutes ago.
Hillary Clinton is so thoroughly corrupt that she doesn’t understand what it means to be corrupt. For Mrs. Clinton there is, and has always been, only “The Game”, how it’s played, and whether you’re the winner or everybody else. In her case, the winning bar is set at “POTUS”, for the power, actual and that which she believes she will develop, that goes with that office. She is a person for whom other people are not actual people, only objects on her game board. She is so out front with her ruthlessness and so bereft of any achievement after being elected / appointed to high-level jobs that I wonder about those who see her as a desirable leader.
We went corrupt awhile back with lobbyist, corporations (they are people too), and wealthy donors could buy presidential candidates.Who gave us money is free speech, legal bribery, but conservatives? Corporations are people too, but conservatives? “Corporations are people, my friend.” Mitt Romney, August 11, 2011.
As far as foreign government influence in US politics it is not always overt like Benjamin Netanyahu speech to congress but most like covert to both political party. Do not think that any side is squeaky clean.
Government is supposed to be “of the people” not corporations or anything else. It makes it hard for it to be “of the people” when one party openly declares war on the government.
Again, you nailed it WiseOrator. I don’t like her. At all. The reasons will be for others to describe. I don’t agree with all those negative comments, by the way, but many do resonate with me. The trouble is there are no republicans I can vote for. The god, guns, guts and glory crowd are troublesome on both sides of the aisle. Where are the peacemakers? What about making government less intrusive, but also fund it properly to fix bridges and teach kids—all kids. More funding for science—basic research. Who is standing up for that? Where are the visionaries who understand the changing nature of our world? Technology is impacting our relationships and our species, society by society. Who is focused on this sort of stuff? If you leave it to the private sector, it will be powerfully unbalanced. Each player must play his part, and respect the other’s sphere. Where are the leaders who understand this balancing act, not without ego, of course, but with the greater good at heart?
All this you that you said you would have a hard time selling if you ran for President as a Republican right now:“What about making government less intrusive, but also fund it properly to fix bridges and teach kids—all kids. More funding for science—basic research. Who is standing up for that? Where are the visionaries who understand the changing nature of our world? Technology is impacting our relationships and our species, society by society. Who is focused on this sort of stuff? If you leave it to the private sector, it will be powerfully unbalanced. Each player must play his part, and respect the other’s sphere. Where are the leaders who understand this balancing act, not without ego, of course, but with the greater good at heart?”You would sort have a hard time in the Democratic party but not among liberals.
Dtroutma about 9 years ago
^Supporting HItler, bailling out to leave your crewmen to die, desertion from the National Guard, Silverado Savings and Loan, WMDs (for revenge, Halliburton and your buddy), don’t dig to deep under the bush pile for sleaze. (don’t have to)
Dtroutma about 9 years ago
^Oh, right, get your daughter off on drug charges as the Governor, that too.
braindead Premium Member about 9 years ago
Stanis is transitioning smoothly from Hatred Of Obama to Hatred Of Hillary.
ConserveGov about 9 years ago
Shrillary used insider trading to make bundles in Whitewater, covered up the reason our Ambassador to Libya and 3 other Americans were murdered, purposely concealed and then covered up all her official communications while Secratary of State and now is using her “Foundation” to solicit money and return favors to foreign governments.I’m sure I missed a few, but do you really need any other reason not to vote for the MOST CORRUPT person to ever run for President?
King_Shark about 9 years ago
I just love how all of you keep arguing whether Killary is better or worse than Bush. The fact that she’s utter, pure evil isn’t important; what’s important is whether she’s more or less utterly pure evil than the other utterly pure evil guy.
Theodore E. Lind Premium Member about 9 years ago
She’s a perfect replacement for President Obama. The Republicans can spend the next eight years vilifying and investigating her while they continue to do nothing in Congress. Hey they might even extend the congressional vacations and make them year round only showing up in Washington on ceremonial occasions.
kaffekup about 9 years ago
Somebody’s whistling past the graveyard (of republican presidential aspirations).
Kip W about 9 years ago
Hillary’s been dealing with the same set of hysterical right-wing lies for decades, and hasn’t broken a sweat yet. Whitewater was the biggest and gaudiest of a series of dry holes that the GOP keeps going back and peeking at, just in case a gusher has decided to come in since the last time they looked, fifteen minutes ago.
dogday Premium Member about 9 years ago
Hillary Clinton is so thoroughly corrupt that she doesn’t understand what it means to be corrupt. For Mrs. Clinton there is, and has always been, only “The Game”, how it’s played, and whether you’re the winner or everybody else. In her case, the winning bar is set at “POTUS”, for the power, actual and that which she believes she will develop, that goes with that office. She is a person for whom other people are not actual people, only objects on her game board. She is so out front with her ruthlessness and so bereft of any achievement after being elected / appointed to high-level jobs that I wonder about those who see her as a desirable leader.
retpost about 9 years ago
New republican wish is that Hillary only have one term.
canFunny about 9 years ago
I ask again, why is the arrow on Hillary’s campaign logo pointing to the right? Who is she planing to serve?
PainterArt Premium Member about 9 years ago
We went corrupt awhile back with lobbyist, corporations (they are people too), and wealthy donors could buy presidential candidates.Who gave us money is free speech, legal bribery, but conservatives? Corporations are people too, but conservatives? “Corporations are people, my friend.” Mitt Romney, August 11, 2011.
As far as foreign government influence in US politics it is not always overt like Benjamin Netanyahu speech to congress but most like covert to both political party. Do not think that any side is squeaky clean.
Government is supposed to be “of the people” not corporations or anything else. It makes it hard for it to be “of the people” when one party openly declares war on the government.
superposition about 9 years ago
http://www.snopes.com/politics/ballot/2012fraud.asp
twclix about 9 years ago
Again, you nailed it WiseOrator. I don’t like her. At all. The reasons will be for others to describe. I don’t agree with all those negative comments, by the way, but many do resonate with me. The trouble is there are no republicans I can vote for. The god, guns, guts and glory crowd are troublesome on both sides of the aisle. Where are the peacemakers? What about making government less intrusive, but also fund it properly to fix bridges and teach kids—all kids. More funding for science—basic research. Who is standing up for that? Where are the visionaries who understand the changing nature of our world? Technology is impacting our relationships and our species, society by society. Who is focused on this sort of stuff? If you leave it to the private sector, it will be powerfully unbalanced. Each player must play his part, and respect the other’s sphere. Where are the leaders who understand this balancing act, not without ego, of course, but with the greater good at heart?
Dtroutma about 9 years ago
All the hateful traits Hillary is accused of by the right, would be perfectly acceptable if she were just MALE, and Republican.(preferably a bush)
PainterArt Premium Member about 9 years ago
All this you that you said you would have a hard time selling if you ran for President as a Republican right now:“What about making government less intrusive, but also fund it properly to fix bridges and teach kids—all kids. More funding for science—basic research. Who is standing up for that? Where are the visionaries who understand the changing nature of our world? Technology is impacting our relationships and our species, society by society. Who is focused on this sort of stuff? If you leave it to the private sector, it will be powerfully unbalanced. Each player must play his part, and respect the other’s sphere. Where are the leaders who understand this balancing act, not without ego, of course, but with the greater good at heart?”You would sort have a hard time in the Democratic party but not among liberals.