Bob Gorrell for April 13, 2015

Shrillary 2016? Hahahahahhahahahahaha!!! Will never happen; buh-bye, Shrillary!

Subtle.

You mean that her campaign is actually going to attempt to find out just what the greater majority of voters want. And then as POTUS after 2016, she will give those ideas to those very voters, just as her husband did. Even though he was personally a liberal, he had the good sense to become relatively conservative when he saw that was what the people wanted at the time. That was why, even with his own personal flaws, he still remained president!!

Both parties are intent on nominating someone everyone hates.

Actually they are really one party at heart, anyhow. They need to continue the trend: Every modern president is worse than the one before

Live with it. ;O)

@hillsmom – Your term of endearment not withstanding, I think many in the Republican party have grown beyond misogyny and would openly support a Good candidate (The Republicans weren’t turned off by Sara Palin but by Crotchety McCain).

But even staunch Democrats must concede that she is a highly polarizing figure. People either lover her or really hate her and she does little to woo those in the hate camp. That makes it difficult for her to reach across the party boundaries and snag voters from the other side.

Her one advantage is that the Republican party seems hell bent on advancing a candidate that is anti-science, anti-intellectual and unwilling to trust women to do what is best for themselves or their families which should be a turn off to any woman who has gotten past the eighth grade.

She doesn’t have the likability or the political skills of her husband and is more deeply embedded in the progressive culture.

A) Proof, please, not just GOP shrieking.

B) Is there a worse lie than that which Dubya told when he said Iraq had WMDs? That lie cost America 4000 lives and Iraq 100,000 lives.

And if you’re still in a (false) lather about Benghazi:

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/ecc3a300383445d5a90dd6ca764c9e15/house-intel-panel-debunks-many-benghazi-theories

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/11/21/no-stand-down-order-or-military-missteps-in-benghazi-attack-gop-controlled/

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/house-benghazi-report-finds-evidence-doesnt-back-rumors-n253921

http://www.aol.com/article/2014/11/22/house-gop-report-debunks-benghazi-conspiracy-theories/20997710/?icid=maing-grid7%7Cmain5%7Cdl1%7Csec1_lnk1%26pLid%3D569127

Did Gorrell forget that George W. Bush is not running in 2016? Or is he just recycling an old Bush cartoon?

I don’t even like Hillary, but really? WMDs as opposed to the facts that backup WAS sent to Benghazi from Tripoli (including the two mercenaries killed on the roof of the CIA annex), after the Ambassador refused to accept State Dept. recommendations and Libyan government folks NOT to set up shop in Benghazi as it was to unstable there.

Or was it that she accepted those lies of WMDs to vote for that other and far deadlier, error in judgement not actually hers to make?

This guy is late to the party. A conservative cartoonist already did this idea a few days back and better I might add. I guess we will see this reiterations of this cartoon for the next 16 months.

And we have the first step in Gorrell’s transition from Hatred Of Obama to Hatred Of Hillary.

Good grief! How many more months of Benson’s lame anti-HRC cartoons? November 2016 can’t come soon enough!

@DrDon1Sorry…I meant “Gorrell!” ( My mind is already numb from all of the Campaign Crap being thrown at us! Will anything positive be accomplished in the next 18 months?