About right. I like “Spamgahazi”. It would be really nice if the Republican house and senate would find some time to do something useful. They could still be Fox news at the capital but pass some bills like immigration, infrastructure, etc.
I think there are valid concerns here. But, I also think, as this cartoon indicates, that as the right did with BENGHAZI, the right will overdo it on the email issue as well.
Anyone seen any Rice or Powell emails or communications during their time, when our actual embassies were attacked, and our people kllled? The “Benghazi incident” has been fully disclosed in multiple books, and other publications, that support the view of Ambassador Stevens’ own famlity: he took his own initiative to go to Benghazi, and NOBODY at the State Department did anything “wrong”, and in fact the actions they DID take, like yes, sending help from Tripoli, including the two contractors who were killed on the roof of the CIA complex, saved all the employees IN that facility, who were evacuated from the turmoil that was Libya.
State didn’t send anyone to help, they went in spite of orders to “stand down”. There were no reasons to see the emails of Rice or Powell, there was no cover-up as there is with Benghazi. Latest emails from Mills and others show that the cover-up started while the embassy attack was ongoing. Of course, there are no known emails to or from Hillary in any of these latest batch.
Attacks on US embassies and consulates during Bush/Cheney reign…No problem! 241 Us Marines killed in Lebanon during Reagan’s reign…No problem! Hooray for selective anguish!
Ghenley: The “backup” was sent from Tripoli to Benghazi by C-130 and they arrived and went to the CIA compound, there was no “stand down” order given. Marines couldn’t leave Tripoli, and the actual embassy because there WERE demonstrations there and warnings, and b. our treaty with the Libyans said no Marines elsewhere. The two mercenaries, er, contractors, killed on the roof were doing the job they were paid for, rescuing the staff, when mortar rounds came in.
As to Rice, Powell, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Wolfowitz’s emails, lots of reasons to see them, summed up with “WMDs”.
Again you are wrong. But that is to be expected. Your left wing nut job leanings are evidence by all your previous diatribes and your statement that those two heroes were mercanaries. Wake up, smell the coffee and see what you liberals (progressives) are doing to our country.
Odon Premium Member about 9 years ago
Mike – Thanks for the break!
Darsan54 Premium Member about 9 years ago
Yep, this sounds about right. That’s the level this debate is on.
Theodore E. Lind Premium Member about 9 years ago
About right. I like “Spamgahazi”. It would be really nice if the Republican house and senate would find some time to do something useful. They could still be Fox news at the capital but pass some bills like immigration, infrastructure, etc.
Cerabooge about 9 years ago
I have no idea what the rest of your link was. I stopped at “breitbart”.
hippogriff about 9 years ago
As any rational person should.
oneoldhat about 9 years ago
so mikey only way of defending th heir apparent is to make things up sad
rayfinfer about 9 years ago
Plus she sat on her hands while four Americans were slaughtered in Benghazi………
goweeder about 9 years ago
“….. I read from all websites and if I see something questionable, I cross-check it.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You cross-check it; I dismiss it. My mind is already too cluttered to work properly.
WGW101 about 9 years ago
I think there are valid concerns here. But, I also think, as this cartoon indicates, that as the right did with BENGHAZI, the right will overdo it on the email issue as well.
Dtroutma about 9 years ago
Anyone seen any Rice or Powell emails or communications during their time, when our actual embassies were attacked, and our people kllled? The “Benghazi incident” has been fully disclosed in multiple books, and other publications, that support the view of Ambassador Stevens’ own famlity: he took his own initiative to go to Benghazi, and NOBODY at the State Department did anything “wrong”, and in fact the actions they DID take, like yes, sending help from Tripoli, including the two contractors who were killed on the roof of the CIA complex, saved all the employees IN that facility, who were evacuated from the turmoil that was Libya.
Gerald Henley about 9 years ago
hey trout, your analysis smells fishy.
State didn’t send anyone to help, they went in spite of orders to “stand down”. There were no reasons to see the emails of Rice or Powell, there was no cover-up as there is with Benghazi. Latest emails from Mills and others show that the cover-up started while the embassy attack was ongoing. Of course, there are no known emails to or from Hillary in any of these latest batch.
Wake up and smell the coffee.
madone about 9 years ago
Good one
DrDon1 about 9 years ago
Attacks on US embassies and consulates during Bush/Cheney reign…No problem! 241 Us Marines killed in Lebanon during Reagan’s reign…No problem! Hooray for selective anguish!
oneoldhat about 9 years ago
yes dtroutma they on the gov email //
Dtroutma about 9 years ago
Ghenley: The “backup” was sent from Tripoli to Benghazi by C-130 and they arrived and went to the CIA compound, there was no “stand down” order given. Marines couldn’t leave Tripoli, and the actual embassy because there WERE demonstrations there and warnings, and b. our treaty with the Libyans said no Marines elsewhere. The two mercenaries, er, contractors, killed on the roof were doing the job they were paid for, rescuing the staff, when mortar rounds came in.
As to Rice, Powell, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Wolfowitz’s emails, lots of reasons to see them, summed up with “WMDs”.
Gerald Henley about 9 years ago
Again you are wrong. But that is to be expected. Your left wing nut job leanings are evidence by all your previous diatribes and your statement that those two heroes were mercanaries. Wake up, smell the coffee and see what you liberals (progressives) are doing to our country.
YOU ARE DESTROYING IT!!!!
kaffekup about 9 years ago
Who could argue with your closely-reasoned logic?(Snicker)
DrDon1 about 9 years ago
@churchillwas rightJust what is your point?