La Cucaracha by Lalo Alcaraz for October 04, 2014

(Hiding from stones): I don’t think Rush is that stupid JMO…

For fun I went to my US Congressman’s Town Hall meeting (Hey I live in Texas) the folks there do really hate Obama just because he is well not one of them…

That’s Elbonia, not Ebola!

No, your friend Limbaugh is an idiot who likes to incite his listening public.

Lalo is working on membership in the bricklayers union. He learning how to lay it on with a trowel. BTW, I like bricklayers. You can always see when they get out of line & they never spin a situation.

Actually Limbaugh has lost weight but his continual outspoken misogyny will always mark him as a pig

So, women haters are pigs? How does that connect?

You’re apparently not familiar (or are feigning unfamiliarity) with the extremely well-known term, “sexist pig.” If you’ve got a complaint about that, I suppose you’ll have to take it up with society at large. Though I generally prefer humans leave animals out of their disagreements with each other. Y’hear that, society at large?

As far as pit bulls, as long as you treat and train them properly, they are actually a relatively sweet breed. Their power combined with a very strong will to please their humans has unfortunately made them attractive as attack dogs and fighting dogs, hence their reputation as “dangerous dogs.”

I’M ASSUMING IT GOES BOTH WAYS – MAN HATERS ARE THEN CALLED SEXIST SOWS?

I don’t know; have you ever heard that one? Anyways, if man haters were to be called sexist sows, woman haters I assume would be called sexist hogs.

THEN YOU ALSO PREFER THAT LALO NOT IMPLY THAT LIMBAUGH IS A BARNYARD ANIMAL?

For the sake of the pig, yes. No joke.

AGAIN YOU ARE TELLING ME WHAT I DO OR DON’T KNOW, OR WHAT I AM DOING.

Nope, I’m giving the options. Either you already knew that or you didn’t. Is there a third option I missed?

I STAND BY MY OBSERVATION THAT MORE WOMEN ARE ATTACKED BY PIT BULLS THAN PIGS IN RECENT TIMES.

I wasn’t necessarily arguing with you on that one, although if looked at on a world-wide level, there are a surprising number of attacks by pigs on humans. Absent clear statistics, which one attacks more is simply a statement of belief, not fact.

You said I’m not familiar…with the…term.That is telling me what I know or don’t know.You said I’m feigning unfamiliarity.That is telling me what I am doing.

You’ve conveniently edited an either/or statement to make it sound as though it was two separate statements. I also said “apparently,” which leaves room for doubt, but you conveniently missed that word, and left it out here. This is what is known as playing fast and loose with the facts. In any case, you were doing one or the other (actually being unfamiliar with the term or feigning ignorance), unless there’s some third option you’re not sharing.

you are STILL telling me what I know or don’t know, and what I am doing

No, I’m saying either you did know or you didn’t. Unless you’re Schrödinger’s cat and in some weird state of quantum superposition, these are the options. What’s hilarious about the whole thing is that you’ve managed to completely wander away from your initial point in order to get snippy about a slight that you’ve completely made up in your own head. (And yes, I’m saying you made that slight up. I’m saying what you did. Unless, of course, this is all theater. And then we’re back to you feigning things.)