I’ve often disagreed with many of Christies views on specifics, but have always admired that he DOES SAY WHAT HE MEANS, and means what he SAYS. Even if “the other party”, it’s something that commands respect, which Chris will get none of for his current stance, from his “own” party.
you check Romney’s own record as Governor of Massachusetts.The city of Peabody Massachusetts is a quiet borough north of Boston, neighboring Salem in Essex County. Historically tied to the tanning industry and agriculture, it was an early hotspot in the automobile industry. Through the town runs the Ipswich River, which is where the problems for Mitt Romney originate.
The state developed a flood prevention plan. With that plan in place, flooding would no longer be an issue should severe rain return to the area. The total cost would have been a paltry $5.7 million, a drop in the bucket compared to the hundreds of millions in damages caused by flooding.The measure, prepared, detailed, and ready to go, hit the governors desk for signature. And Governor Romney promptly vetoed it.In 2004, severe rain caused the river to overflow, causing widespread flooding.
braindead Premium Member over 11 years ago
Chris, you look great! Have you been working out?
Dtroutma over 11 years ago
I’ve often disagreed with many of Christies views on specifics, but have always admired that he DOES SAY WHAT HE MEANS, and means what he SAYS. Even if “the other party”, it’s something that commands respect, which Chris will get none of for his current stance, from his “own” party.
pirate227 over 11 years ago
Reality check!
oldrellek99 over 11 years ago
you check Romney’s own record as Governor of Massachusetts.The city of Peabody Massachusetts is a quiet borough north of Boston, neighboring Salem in Essex County. Historically tied to the tanning industry and agriculture, it was an early hotspot in the automobile industry. Through the town runs the Ipswich River, which is where the problems for Mitt Romney originate.
The state developed a flood prevention plan. With that plan in place, flooding would no longer be an issue should severe rain return to the area. The total cost would have been a paltry $5.7 million, a drop in the bucket compared to the hundreds of millions in damages caused by flooding.The measure, prepared, detailed, and ready to go, hit the governors desk for signature. And Governor Romney promptly vetoed it.In 2004, severe rain caused the river to overflow, causing widespread flooding.