Clay Bennett by Clay Bennett

Clay Bennett

Comments (13) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. ODon

    ODon said, about 1 year ago

    Amazing what happens once you add an axle.

  2. Stipple

    Stipple said, about 1 year ago

    Shhhh, let’s see if he can figure that out on his own.

  3. mskemple

    mskemple said, about 1 year ago

    Gruuunt – flop , gruuunt – flop , gruuunt flop – we’ll have this running perfectly by November 30th! Darn designers! It’s the Republicans fault! What I meant when I said what I said wasn’t what I meant to say , I mean that!

  4. alcors3

    alcors3 said, about 1 year ago

    A lot smarter than too many voters.

  5. churchillwasright

    churchillwasright said, about 1 year ago

    @Debt Free

    That’s an incredible link. Sebelius should watch it and commit hari-kari. Then Obama should watch it and resign.

    For the cut and paste challenged:

    CBS News: S.F. programmers build alternative to HealthCare.gov

  6. cjr53

    cjr53 said, about 1 year ago

    @ODon

    Yep, and maybe the obstructionists will have a change of heart and help by bringing one. I can hope and dream can’t I?

  7. Uncle Joe

    Uncle Joe GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    @Debt Free

    3 programmers write a website that works and addresses the problems with the Obamacare website failure.

    Healthsherpa.com is a trivial system compared to Healthcare.gov. Sherpa takes 3 pieces of information (age, zip code & whether you smoke) and references a data table of insurance plans & rates, to give you a quote on available insurance plans.

    That (sort of) addressed ONE problem with the healthcare.gov website, that’s actually already been somewhat addressed. The decision to require registration before getting any approximate price quotes was a mistake. That was reversed weeks ago. You can get the same info from Healthcare.gov without registering now. It works just fine.

    What Healthsherpa does NOT do, is:

    1) Authenticate identity against government data bases
    2) Verify income against government data bases
    3) Guide them through the application process
    4) Send that application data on to insurance companies for enrollment.

    Those are the problems that are proving hard to fix. Pretending that 3 guys replicated the functionality of Healthcare.gov is typical talking points nonsense.

    Private insurance brokers like ehealthinsurance.com have been told they can tie into the government system & sell ACA policies, but the process seems to be held up. Maybe Congress could ask about that. It sure would have taken a lot of heat off of the Administration, if they had this alternative system in place earlier.

    http://venturebeat.com/2013/10/23/the-next-chapter-for-healthcare-gov/

  8. churchillwasright

    churchillwasright said, about 1 year ago

    @Uncle Joe

    Yeah, but they did it in only 3 days, in their spare time, and with no budget, not a billion $$.

  9. Uncle Joe

    Uncle Joe GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    @churchillwasright

    “Yeah, but they did it in only 3 days, in their spare time, and with no budget, not a billion $$.

    Like I said, what they did is a trivial system. Writing a front end with no security, to return results from an existing database, shouldn’t take any time at all. They have had to fix some bugs & they actually continued tweaking after getting it up in running in 3 days.

    Where they deserve kudos, is creating a simple, elegant interface to let people get price quotes. They did do a nicer job than the page that does the equivalent thing on Healthcare.gov.

    Someone else compiled & organized the policy data into a system ready for them to use. All they provide are insurance company names & a phone numbers. It’s a useful tool, but I don’t see it as a ‘fix’ to Healthcare.gov

    In their own words:

    “It isn’t a fair apples-to-apples comparison,” Kalogeropoulos said. “Unlike Healthcare.gov, our site doesn’t connect to the IRS, DHS, and various state exchanges and authorities. Furthermore, we’re using the government’s data, so our site is only possible because of the hard work that the Healthcare.gov team has done.”

    Read more: http://www.wptv.com/dpp/news/national/george-kalogeropoulos-ning-liang-michael-wasser-health-sherpa-young-coders-build-site-in-3-days#ixzz2kRbadmkG

  10. pirate227

    pirate227 said, about 1 year ago

    Reminds me of the medicare part D roll-out.

  11. churchillwasright

    churchillwasright said, about 1 year ago

    @Uncle Joe

    You don’t understand the difference between 3 days and 3 years. You also probably have problems between “million”, “billion” and “trillion”.

  12. Uncle Joe

    Uncle Joe GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    @churchillwasright

    Churlish & childish, Churchie. I actually said Healthsherpa.com, did what they did, better than CGI Federal. But, they didn’t attempt anything near the scale of the Healthcare.gov site by their own admission.

    Feel free to continue pointing out the website debacle, but you & everyone else pretending 3 guys beat the gub’mint troops, look ignorant to anyone with a passing knowledge of how websites work.

  13. Uncle Joe

    Uncle Joe GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    @Tigger

    Think about the snowball metaphor, Tigger.

    It’s inefficient, but keep rolling & it gets Bigger.

  14. Refresh Comments.