Adam@Home by Rob Harrell

Adam@Home

Comments (25) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Saskfan

    Saskfan said, over 1 year ago

    Volunteers can be fired, but if you need someone, and there’s no one to take the person’s place, it’s hard to fire the person.

  2. Alexikakos

    Alexikakos said, over 1 year ago

    Miss? Come to think of it, where is Laura’s wedding ring.

  3. Jenn

    Jenn said, over 1 year ago

    The desk-nut is likely a pet-hoarder at home. Unfortunately, she’s got a name-tag and a job at a shelter to make it seem like a legitimate way of life. Which makes her the neighbor from hell, and the scariest woman on the block. (Yeesh!)

  4. pcolli

    pcolli said, over 1 year ago

    @Alexikakos

    Wedding rings aren’t compulsory – just a hangover from the days when property was marked.

  5. Plods with Beer ( did I mention beer? )

    Plods with Beer ( did I mention beer? ) GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    Maybe a few weeks on poop patrol would get some of the animals adopted.

  6. cdward

    cdward said, over 1 year ago

    @Alexikakos

    My guess is, they just forgot to draw it. We know she’s married. And while pcolli is right that rings aren’t compulsory, most husbands and wives do wear them.

  7. BartJ385

    BartJ385 said, over 1 year ago

    Wouldn’t a cone collar just tell her that the one who wears it likes to lick themselves …

  8. Mark

    Mark said, over 1 year ago

    I do not like the cone of shame.

  9. Doctor11

    Doctor11 GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    @pcolli

    That’s not true, and how rude of you to say that since the wedding ring is a sign of an eternal marriage.

  10. Doctor11

    Doctor11 GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    She needs to fire that mean woman and hire a new assistant.

  11. Felix The Cat

    Felix The Cat said, over 1 year ago

    Maybe, uh, she should be, uh, fired? Oh, wait; never mind. She is a government employee in a public sector union. She can never be fired, ever.

  12. Tom Flapwell

    Tom Flapwell GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    @pcolli

    Might I point out that both spouses wear rings, so by your logic, they would be each other’s property. Nothing sexist if that’s what you thought.

  13. ssejhill

    ssejhill said, over 1 year ago

    Dog cone? How about a muzzle.

  14. Amanda Greeley

    Amanda Greeley GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    @Tom Flapwell

    Both spouses wearing a ring is a new thing. Back 75+ years and more only the wife use to wear a ring to mark that she was married and her husband not her father was responsible for her.

  15. pcolli

    pcolli said, over 1 year ago

    @Doctor11

    There is no such law.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (10).