Adam@Home by Rob Harrell

Adam@Home

Comments (27) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Saskfan

    Saskfan said, 9 months ago

    Volunteers can be fired, but if you need someone, and there’s no one to take the person’s place, it’s hard to fire the person.

  2. Alexikakos

    Alexikakos said, 9 months ago

    Miss? Come to think of it, where is Laura’s wedding ring.

  3. Jenn

    Jenn said, 9 months ago

    The desk-nut is likely a pet-hoarder at home. Unfortunately, she’s got a name-tag and a job at a shelter to make it seem like a legitimate way of life. Which makes her the neighbor from hell, and the scariest woman on the block. (Yeesh!)

  4. pcolli

    pcolli said, 9 months ago

    @Alexikakos

    Wedding rings aren’t compulsory – just a hangover from the days when property was marked.

  5. Plods with Beer ( did I mention beer? )

    Plods with Beer ( did I mention beer? ) said, 9 months ago

    Maybe a few weeks on poop patrol would get some of the animals adopted.

  6. cdward

    cdward said, 9 months ago

    @Alexikakos

    My guess is, they just forgot to draw it. We know she’s married. And while pcolli is right that rings aren’t compulsory, most husbands and wives do wear them.

  7. BartJ385

    BartJ385 said, 9 months ago

    Wouldn’t a cone collar just tell her that the one who wears it likes to lick themselves …

  8. Mark

    Mark said, 9 months ago

    I do not like the cone of shame.

  9. Doctor11

    Doctor11 said, 9 months ago

    @pcolli

    That’s not true, and how rude of you to say that since the wedding ring is a sign of an eternal marriage.

  10. Doctor11

    Doctor11 said, 9 months ago

    She needs to fire that mean woman and hire a new assistant.

  11. SUSAN NEWMAN

    SUSAN NEWMAN said, 9 months ago

    Thank heavens there ONE kind person at that shelter.
    Feel better, Laura?

  12. Felix The Cat

    Felix The Cat said, 9 months ago

    Maybe, uh, she should be, uh, fired? Oh, wait; never mind. She is a government employee in a public sector union. She can never be fired, ever.

  13. Stephen Gilberg

    Stephen Gilberg said, 9 months ago

    @pcolli

    Might I point out that both spouses wear rings, so by your logic, they would be each other’s property. Nothing sexist if that’s what you thought.

  14. ssejhill

    ssejhill said, 9 months ago

    Dog cone? How about a muzzle.

  15. Amanda Greeley

    Amanda Greeley said, 9 months ago

    @Stephen Gilberg

    Both spouses wearing a ring is a new thing. Back 75+ years and more only the wife use to wear a ring to mark that she was married and her husband not her father was responsible for her.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (12).