One’s “sexual identity” has nothing whatsoever to do with the military’s mission. DADT was the beginning of social engineering and the devolution of the military’s mission. Being free to be openly homosexual does nothing but bring discord within the unit structure. Women and men shouldn’t be housed in the same company barracks, for obvious reasons, and the same applies to soldiers who want to be openly homosexual in the same circumstances. This isn’t “evolution.” It’s corrupting, and it will ruin esprit de corps. I know that means nothing to you, but then again, you don’t give a damn about the essential necessity of our military’s true purpose. All you care about is “fairness.”
One’s “sexual identity” has nothing whatsoever to do with the military’s mission. DADT was the beginning of social engineering and the devolution of the military’s mission. Being free to be openly homosexual does nothing but bring discord within the unit structure. Women and men shouldn’t be housed in the same company barracks, for obvious reasons, and the same applies to soldiers who want to be openly homosexual in the same circumstances. This isn’t “evolution.” It’s corrupting, and it will ruin esprit de corps. I know that means nothing to you, but then again, you don’t give a damn about the essential necessity of our military’s true purpose. All you care about is “fairness.”