Recent Comments

1. 6 days ago on Ripley's Believe It or Not

   The UK is a totalitarian state

2. about 1 month ago on Frazz

   The ecosystem of an entire planet is vastly more complex than falling down a hill. I simply don’t have confidence in a handful of elitists thinking they know best how to tell the world’s population how to live.

   Furthermore, I have confidence in God’s promise that He will sustain life and seasons on the earth as long as it endures (Gen 8:22). All of nature responds to His command, not ours, so I don’t need to live in fear trying to control the earth itself.

3. about 1 month ago on Frazz

   We haven’t been recording the weather for very long. A few hundred years out of thousands really isn’t enough to know what “normal” weather is, much less what impact human behavior has on it. People are part of the ecosystem too, but we’re the only ones getting judged and controlled for our part in it

4. about 1 month ago on FoxTrot Classics

   I thought I had read every foxtrot strip. Apparently I missed one. Clearly for good reason

5. about 2 months ago on Frazz

   Answers in Genesis has a lot of intelligent scientists offering alternative theories. If you have the time and desire, they are worth reading, if nothing else to understand the other perspective.

6. about 2 months ago on Frazz

   Not every species. Every kind (Gen 6:20). This matches closer to what we would call the family level in our modern schema of classifications. The ark only needed two of the dog family, two of the cat family, two of the rhinoceros family, etc. not every small variation. You can math this out in a variety of different ways, but around 7,000 animals would be sufficient. A reasonable size of the ark would be 510ft long, 85ft wide, and 50ft high, which is enough to hold 120,000 sheep, more than enough to hold all the animals.

   If all you are looking for are reasons it could not work, that is what you will find, even if you have to ignore reasonable theories to do it.

7. about 2 months ago on Frazz

   One guy didn’t make it through the ides of march. That meant something to quite a few people

8. about 2 months ago on Frazz

   You don’t have to have a field of research in the supernatural to let its existence inform your interpretations. By definition, the supernatural cannot be quantified by natural means, but that does not mean it cannot be understood. This is a question about worldviews and interpretation of evidence. An atheist and a Christian can both look at the same scientific data but come up with different conclusions about how it got there. The atheist can only accept naturalistic explanations whereas the Christian can accept natural explanations and supernatural explanations because we believe all natural law was put in place by the supernatural law giver. Often times the naturalistic explanations has to warp or ignore reality in order to make it work.

9. about 2 months ago on Frazz

   Newton was a Christian as were many other scientists of his day. They sought to understand how the world was ordered because they believe in an orderly God who ordered the world. Most of the approved authorities on science today won’t even entertain the idea of the supernatural.

10. 2 months ago on Ripley's Believe It or Not

    This isn’t just a quirky comic section fun fact. This is a serious ongoing problem with the airline infrastructure. Transportation is in shambles