Matt Wuerker for December 13, 2019


Hide All Comments
  1. Snl mrbill doll
    claudio645  2 months ago

    Supporting the troops does NOT mean supporting the defense contractors with trillions of dollars.

     •  Reply
  2. Missing large
    hankmorgan  2 months ago

    October 2011 Scientific American has an article, “Afghanistan’s Buried Riches”, showing the US Marines did geologic surveys of Afghanistan that showed it has enough strategic mineral wealth – including rare earth metals – to make a trillion dollars look like chicken feed.

    Iron, Gold, Cobalt. Rare Earths, A pentagon memo calls Afghanistan “The Saudi Arabia of Lithium”. All there for the taking. Maybe, instead of trying to have the Army steal it from the Afghans (like Iraqi oil) you could have just paid for it.

    Read it and weep….“The Pentagon’s Map of Afghanistan: An Eldorado of Mineral Wealth and Natural Resources”

     •  Reply
  3. Agent gates130516four
    Rad-ish says, posting NA on Sherpa Premium Member 2 months ago

    And all the billions the unaudited Dept of Defense can steal.

     •  Reply
  4. 1be5f3b2 0fd4 40fd ad1f 69b3df564ed4
    Zebrastripes  2 months ago

    I believe AMERICAS past presidents kiss the Saudis rings and bow just FOR that purpose. $$$$$$$$$$$$$

     •  Reply
  5. Picture
    MaryBethJavorek1  2 months ago

    Amazes me that we are spending all this money on the military when the enemies are being welcomed into the oval office with open arms and gushes of praise

     •  Reply
  6. 22ebfcac ced8 4f81 81ab 38a9544c0f83
    ragsarooni Premium Member 2 months ago

    Shades of Vietnam…???

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    randolini Premium Member 2 months ago

    “You can’t fix stupid.” Ron White.

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    wellis1947 Premium Member 2 months ago

    Leaving aside the “trillions” in mineral wealth that supposedly exist in Afghanistan, which, like the oil in Iraq, America had neither claim nor right to; Afghanistan has been log known as the “Graveyard of Empires” because due to it’s government and it geography, it is almost impossible to either conquer or hold and the historians in the pentagon “think tanks” knew this going in.

    The “surgical strike” against bin Laden’s camp was one thing, and, quite possibly would have worked, had not Bush/Chaney and their generals not been distracted by a desire to exact revenge on the ruler of Iraq/ seize Iraq’s oil fields, but the attempt to conquer and hold massive amounts of territory quite another.

    That NEVER works against a country and a society such as Afghanistan. Some of the would-be invaders in the history of Afghanistan include the Maurya Empire of ancient India, Alexander the Great of Macedon, Umar, an Arab Caliphate, Genghis Khan of Mongolia, Timur of Persia and Central Asia, the Mughal Empire of India, various Persian Empires, the British Empire, the Sikh Empire, the Soviet Union, … That last, lengthy enumeration of would-be “conquerors” is from “Wikipedia”, an excellent source of practically any information you might need (and “Wikipedia” could certainly use a tiny bit of financial assistance, right now, people…)

     •  Reply
  9. Nomagram
    COL Crash  2 months ago

    The real cost of that goes far beyond the mere waste of money that could be better spent. It is in the tragic loss of the lives of so many members of the Military sent on that fool’s errand. Add to that the physical and mental damage inflicted on the survivors who will have to deal with that for the rest of their lives.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Matt Wuerker