Clay Bennett for August 09, 2012

  1. Swc1
    SaltWaterCroc  over 11 years ago

    They’ll never see the light of day. Of course, when you’ve stashed $100 million tax free in an IRA, you don’t have to pay taxes.

     •  Reply
  2. Birthcontrol
    Dtroutma  over 11 years ago

    Let’s just see his financial disclosure forms that any appointee or government employee at GS-12 and above would have to provide. Oh right, he’d have “blind trusts”. (Blind only to his hands-on manipulation and participation.)

     •  Reply
  3. Birthcontrol
    Dtroutma  over 11 years ago

    Tigger, mine aren’t relevant, but when I was working, my financial disclosure was to my employer, as my current are to the state, because I serve a function for the society, and could, if corrupt, personally profit. It’s where Mitt got his money, and how, and where it went, that IS relevant.

     •  Reply
  4. Comics pearlsbeforeswine ratangry
    Heavy B  over 11 years ago

    Because Kerry released 20 years you dope.

     •  Reply
  5. Albert einstein brain i6
    braindead Premium Member over 11 years ago

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/18/mitt-romney-taxes-2010_n_1683084.html?utm_hp_ref=elections-2012-Per huffington post, Willard’s release of his 2010 return is incomplete. Seems to be missing a form about his Swiss account. Probably another ‘clerical’ error.

     •  Reply
  6. Jude
    tcolkett  over 11 years ago

    Because he released 5 years and had already released all the others during his senate campaigns. You billionaire hangers-on lap dogs really should try researching outside of the Fox propaganda smokescreen.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Clay Bennett