Shilling is the most agrivious, he did nothing but have a view thats guaranteed by the US Constitution. None of which effected the integrity of the game. If having a point of view can keep you out of the HOF, then Baseball is really no longer America’s Passtime.
Drew missed the boat on this one. Why should someone’s political views affect his HOF status. And I love the little jab “alt-right”. Just like the cry of racism, alt-right is no getting overused. Just because someone has a different viewpoint does not mean you can automatically discount their view by saying they are alt-right.
RobinHood over 3 years ago
Shilling is the most agrivious, he did nothing but have a view thats guaranteed by the US Constitution. None of which effected the integrity of the game. If having a point of view can keep you out of the HOF, then Baseball is really no longer America’s Passtime.
Mike Smith over 3 years ago
Drew missed the boat on this one. Why should someone’s political views affect his HOF status. And I love the little jab “alt-right”. Just like the cry of racism, alt-right is no getting overused. Just because someone has a different viewpoint does not mean you can automatically discount their view by saying they are alt-right.
Otis Rufus Driftwood over 3 years ago
If the selection method for the Baseball Hall of Fame isn’t based on merit, there probably shouldn’t be one.
saanderson2 over 3 years ago
Pete Rose should be there !!! Schilling is fine too !