Jen Sorensen for February 16, 2016

  1. Birthcontrol
    Dtroutma  over 8 years ago

    Good analysis.

     •  Reply
  2. Peter cooke   hood
    Ottodesu  over 8 years ago

    I live in a country that os a dead-set rock-solid ally of the USA.Should we invade your country so that it can be made safe for Democracy?

     •  Reply
  3. Paint corn
    kernelcorny Premium Member over 8 years ago

    Lisa Benson by Lisa Benson, February 03, 2016 Via @GoComics-The Yale school of law tried to conflate civilian law with military secret law/national security secret law and achieved the lowest common denominator: lèse-majesté and the divine right of kings (monarchy dictatorship).-Yale has been the leader of Ivy League and public law schools.Military law legalizes violent crimes by violent criminals against an enemy or incidentals or collateral damage.National security law legalizes war crimes and crimes against humanity.Judges are supposed to decide whether laws are civilian laws (based on common law precedent) or military/national security laws (statutory laws).Perfectly legal in worse Hell is perfectly innocent in worse Hell is perfectly forgiven in worse Hell.

     •  Reply
  4. Picture 1
    Theodore E. Lind Premium Member over 8 years ago

    Everybody hates gridlock and the do nothing government, however, everybody keeps voting for “their guy” year after year. I guess the congress does really represent the citizens who are content to do battle year after year rather than try to reach compromise positions that are best for the country. It would be nice if a really competent and respected person were nominated rather than focusing on only their liberal or conservative bias.

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    moderateisntleft  over 8 years ago

    The Tea Party tried that and almost succeeded. That’s why McConnell has to take a hard line or he’ll get the Boehner treatment.

     •  Reply
  6. Linkingbookchannelwood
    toahero  over 8 years ago

    well, he should technically be able too, but he won’t be able. This election can decide the control of all three branches of government now.

     •  Reply
  7. 0504 yellow garden cat  maybe new avatar  dsc02785
    leeisme  over 8 years ago

    Wonderful ’toon.

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    BigShell  over 8 years ago

    As long as we are referring to history:

    What was the liberal view when it was thought Bush might get to make a late term appointment? What did democratic Senator Chuck Schumer have to say back in 2007. “We should reverse the presumption of confirmation” and “I will recommend to my colleagues that we should not confirm a Supreme Court nominee except in extraordinary circumstances.”

    Seems back then it was OK that the court might go 18 months without a member but it is now bad if it should go 11 months.

     •  Reply
  9. Beacon 5
    doverdan  over 8 years ago

    I wonder if the GOP Senate would refuse it, if Obama named McCain?.They would find new Constitutional theory to back it up.

     •  Reply
  10. Beacon 5
    doverdan  over 8 years ago

    The Senate should supply advice and perhaps consent.It need not pass any specific candidate..The Senate has usually passed one of its members with little opposition. It is a club..Cruz is unpopular in part because he refuses to belong to the club.

     •  Reply
  11. Ironbde
    Carl  Premium Member over 8 years ago

    Ahh yes Kennedy, after the nonelection year nominee was rejected by the Senate, controlled by the Democrats. SO based on the actions, per the cartoon, the Senate can reject the President’s nominee.

     •  Reply
  12. Missing large
    FirefighterMike  about 8 years ago

    We need some criteria, qualifications for these jobs: President, SCOTUS, Congress. Not just “Is he partisan in favor of my side?” But especially SCOTUS. How many unconstitutional decisions have been made by narrow margin, partisan majority of the SCOTUS ?

    If any part of the Constitution is outdated it should be amended, not ignored or misread. And what it says should be followed. I dream of a USA that truly follows the Constitution, especially the Bill of Rights (all of it)

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Jen Sorensen