Clay Jones for March 16, 2010

  1. Reagan ears
    d_legendary1  about 14 years ago

    Cause guns are very important to American history.

     •  Reply
  2. Birthcontrol
    Dtroutma  about 14 years ago

    That’s been Texas history for a long time.

     •  Reply
  3. 225px president rutherford hayes 1870   1880 restored
    POPPA1956  about 14 years ago

    it’s the same way we won at Fort McHenry, isn’t it?

     •  Reply
  4. 1107121618000
    CorosiveFrog Premium Member about 14 years ago

    Everything’s bigger in Texas, even idiocy!

     •  Reply
  5. Submissions 039
    davesmithsit  about 14 years ago

    Most of the time history is revised its for P.C. Gee wonder who does that?

     •  Reply
  6. Hawaii5 0girl
    treered  about 14 years ago

    usually the winners write the history; course that depends on how you define “winner”…

     •  Reply
  7. Mexico border
    TruthfulTheocracy  about 14 years ago

    Very sad.

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    comYics  about 14 years ago

    Well, whom is controlling that Alamo…

     •  Reply
  9. Missing large
    hastynote Premium Member about 14 years ago

    “You have a right to your own opinions; but not to your own facts!” P.Moynihan

    I think I’ll start a chain of private schools in Texas. I’ll call them “TRUTH TO POWER–DEMOCRATIC AND JEFFERSONIAN”

    Every student will be required to have a religion; but, they will be required to keep it out of school. Rev. Dr. Bob Hasty

     •  Reply
  10. Mexico border
    TruthfulTheocracy  about 14 years ago

    Seriously Doctor Canuck? We won the Alamo? MANDE!

    So how come Texas belongs to you guys?

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    oneoldhat  about 14 years ago

    they are reading the history books that are being replaced

     •  Reply
  12. 300px little nemo 1906 02 11 last panel
    lonecat  about 14 years ago

    ^^^^^ That should be “who is controlling that Alamo”, not “whom”; “who” is the subject of the verb “is” and therefore it must be in the subjective (or nominative) case, not in the objective (or accusative) case. If we are talking about the quality of education, perhaps we should extend the discussion to include basic grammar.

     •  Reply
  13. Image013
    believecommonsense  about 14 years ago

    Why don’t the schools in the other 49 states just tell publishers they won’t buy any textbook that is approved by a Texas school board? Sheesh, just don’t give them this kind of unwarranted, undeserved power!! Don’t play victim, take a stand!

     •  Reply
  14. Missing large
    kennethcwarren64  about 14 years ago

    Just remember while you were out thinking about who to vote for for President, or Senator, or Representative, the Far Right was out voting for who would be on the Board of Education, or local school board.

     •  Reply
  15. Missing large
    comYics  about 14 years ago

    Little by little Bob Hasty widdles away the religion out of the lifes of those poor innocent children, so sad Bob.

    Nah I chose to use whom, so whom it is.

    Until you get an English fellow or lady from England to correct it unto how it was originally spoken, then your arguments about the butchered American English language are lost.

    I said, good day!

     •  Reply
  16. 300px little nemo 1906 02 11 last panel
    lonecat  about 14 years ago

    ^^ If you were to say that 2+2=47, and if I were to say, oops, no, that’s 2+2=4, would you say “Nah, I choose to say 2+2=47”? If you were to say “Julius Caesar was killed last Tuesday” and if I were to say, oops, no, it was in 44 BC, would you say, “Nah, I choose to say last Tuesday”? If you were to go to church in your underwear, and it I were to say, oops, you forgot your pants, would you say, “Nah, I choose briefs”? Just wondering.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Clay Jones