yes, Jase99, the “Responsible” reaction to documented evidence of “Influence For Money” is to point to opponents who do not begin to have the baggage of a lifetime history of seeking after “The Money”!-http://pjmedia.com/andrewmccarthy/2015/04/23/the-emerging-clinton-foundation-scandal/?print=1-An independent prosecutor should be chosen by Congress to avoid the president’s bias, and a RICO case is justified IMO.-Democrat Senator Menendez (NJ) was just indicted by Obama’s “Justice Dept.” on far less evidence than there exists for the Clintons. And before “Clinton Cash” (a 10 year research product) was published the author gave it to several non-conservative entities to review and comment: the New York Times, the Washington Post, ABC TV, Fox News and others. None of them denounced the book, and many are doing their own research because common sense is seeing the serious and authentic evidence that something in the Clinton Foundation is very rotten and smelly!
yes, Jase99, the “Responsible” reaction to documented evidence of “Influence For Money” is to point to opponents who do not begin to have the baggage of a lifetime history of seeking after “The Money”!-http://pjmedia.com/andrewmccarthy/2015/04/23/the-emerging-clinton-foundation-scandal/?print=1-An independent prosecutor should be chosen by Congress to avoid the president’s bias, and a RICO case is justified IMO.-Democrat Senator Menendez (NJ) was just indicted by Obama’s “Justice Dept.” on far less evidence than there exists for the Clintons. And before “Clinton Cash” (a 10 year research product) was published the author gave it to several non-conservative entities to review and comment: the New York Times, the Washington Post, ABC TV, Fox News and others. None of them denounced the book, and many are doing their own research because common sense is seeing the serious and authentic evidence that something in the Clinton Foundation is very rotten and smelly!