Comments (16) (Please sign in to comment)

1. 

   surfstuff55 said, 4 months ago

   anybody got a broomstick?
2. 

   Gary McSpook said, 4 months ago

   Amen, brother.
3. 

   Corosive Frog said, 4 months ago

   Beebee Doodle says;
   So true!

   AND STOP SNIFFING MY BUTT!
4. 

   Clark Kent said, 4 months ago

   Panel 2 ain’t gonna happen. The male body is ugly and repulsive, especially to women, and women do not lust.
5. 

   mikefive said, 4 months ago

   @Clark Kent

   Women do not lust?
6. 

   Ivan4u said, 4 months ago

   If you put healthy young men & women together, guess what’s gonna happen? And please do not even pretend to be surprised!
7. 

   Mhic Dhu Ghaill said, 4 months ago

   @Clark Kent

   Not after you,Klark Kant.
8. 

   ReasonsVentriloquist said, 4 months ago

   Is the pinky finger really that hard to add?
   .
   And in this case, a thumb?
   .
   Just noting… Otherwise an ‘ok’ cartoon. But men and women are just different this way (although not in Clark’s way).
   .
   The thing about man on woman sexual harassment is that it is about being in a power position. When it is woman on man, first problem is the power, second problem is the position.
   .
   F. Lee Baily won many rape cases by waving a coke bottle in front of the accuser and directing her to put her finger in the opening. You can’t do it until the bottle stops moving, which represented the time when the act became consentual (in F Lee’s opinion).
   .
   The same can’t be done the other way, because if the finger doesn’t point, you can’t get the coke bottle on it. Position power.
   .
   F Lee was pretty dispicable, even if he was a “lefty.” (Denny Crane!)
9. 

   1opinion said, 4 months ago

   @Mhic Dhu Ghaill

   McDougall, how many lust for you?
10. 

    hippogriff said, 4 months ago

    ReasonsVentriloquist: That was because the honorable court wouldn’t let the witness beat the lawyer into a bloody pulp before sticking the finger in. (Or even making a credible threat to do so.)
11. 

    The Wolf In Your Midst said, 4 months ago

    @Clark Kent

    Don’t extrapolate your own life experience to all of reality, please.
12. 

    ReasonsVentriloquist said, 4 months ago

    @hippogriff

    As I said, He was a creep. He made his fortune doing that, then he did other things that were much less creepy.
    .
    But the point still is that it is danged hard for a woman to sexually harass a man.
    .
    Look at the stories about the female teacher having relations with a student, there are danged few men who don’t say to themselves, “lucky bastard”
13. 

    HighPriestMikhal said, 4 months ago

    @mikefive

    Just when I thought your comments couldn’t be any more ignorant…

    .
    This is so true. Despite the Twentieth Century the US military is still such an Old Boys’ Club it’s scary. Women who come forward are just as likely to be cited for chauvinist reasons than to be taken seriously. Then there’s being beaten almost (if not actually to) death if the men find out (you don’t rat out your “buddies”). Let’s start cleaning things up by going after those four- and five-star generals who cover things up by tearing up their pensions and putting them in prison. They’ll get to experience firsthand what a lot of women in the service do.
14. 

    lisapaloma13 said, 4 months ago

    To those who are harping on “women can’t rape men”, two points (or three):
    1) There have been cases of men accusing women of rape. If it weren’t possible for men to become aroused unwillingly, why would men be so afraid of prostate exams?
    2) Why are you assuming that the men would be harassed by women (or by women that they would find attractive)?
    3) Why are you assuming that the interaction would be of the same type as “normal” heterosexual sex? Why not the way men abuse boys? or as the first commenter said, with a broomstick?
15. 

    rossevrymn said, 4 months ago

    What a maroon!
16. Load the rest of the comments (1).