Signe Wilkinson by Signe Wilkinson

Signe Wilkinson

Comments (25) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. capndunzzl

    capndunzzl said, over 3 years ago

    …wal mart might take it back.

  2. Radish

    Radish GoComics PRO Member said, over 3 years ago

    Pakistan’s Triangle Shirtwaist fire.

  3. ConserveGov

    ConserveGov said, over 3 years ago

    They do start smoking young.

  4. omQ R

    omQ R said, over 3 years ago

    @ConserveGov

    ConserveGov said‘They do start smoking young.’
    With that wise-crack I hope you were unaware of the fire in the garment factory in Bagladesh that killed 112. It had Walmart, Sears & Disney as customers, hence the cartoon.

  5. Sr NONliberal

    Sr NONliberal said, over 3 years ago

    No we don’t. Fear mongering is so cliche coming from both extremes.

  6. cdward

    cdward said, over 3 years ago

    @Sr NONliberal

    Of course it’s true. If it weren’t, you all (since you self-identify as a plutocrat) would not have outsourced all those jobs to places where you can abuse employees so badly. Slave wages, no regulation, poor quality – that’s what it was like here before labor organized, and once outsourcing became practical, that’s what plutocrats went back to. Seems to be in your DNA.

  7. AshburnStadium

    AshburnStadium said, over 3 years ago

    And that would take us back to the days of the Triangle Shirtwaist fire, as mentioned by Radish. Back on Saturday, March 25, 1911, that company, which was also a textile mill, caught fire.
    Management had locked the exits and stairwells to keep the employees at their jobs as well as to prevent pilferage.
    146 people died and 72 were injured, some as they jumped out of windows on the 8th, 9th and 10th floors. The oldest person to die was 48 while the youngest was only ELEVEN years old! Most were immigrant Jewish and Italian women, ages 16-22.
    As olfart said, our plutocrats want to take us back to those days where there are no protections for workers and that children would be laboring as well in these sweatshops.

  8. narrowminded

    narrowminded said, over 3 years ago

    What? People working? Where? This is unacceptable, these people should have been home living off the Govn. We need to get some progressives over there quick.

  9. Respectful Troll

    Respectful Troll said, over 3 years ago

    A few years ago, in the spirit of “Thank You for Smoking”, a man representing an overseas clothing maker said, “Yes, they are working for substandard wages, but because they are working for us, they are being underpaid less than they would if they worked for another company.”
    The lobbyists probably made over 200k a year to convince people that we’re doing workers in sweatshops a favor, but the CEOs and managers are making very good money, even tho they are making nothing, they just keep the poorly paid productive.
    This is not an American value.
    Respectfully,
    C.

  10. lonecat

    lonecat said, over 3 years ago

    @Radish

    Radish, thanks for the reference. An important history lesson.

  11. lonecat

    lonecat said, over 3 years ago

    And Michael, thanks as usual for pointing out the underlying thinking.

  12. mikefive

    mikefive said, over 3 years ago

    The outsourcing of the textile and clothing industry started long ago, as far back as the sixties that I have knowledge of.

  13. AshburnStadium

    AshburnStadium said, over 3 years ago

    Your way of thinking is not the solution for the loss of American jobs – it’s the very problem.

  14. Radish

    Radish GoComics PRO Member said, over 3 years ago

    Pakistan seems a hundred years behind us in labor relations. Hey Teapubs, it sounds like your kind of paradise.

  15. walruscarver2000

    walruscarver2000 said, over 3 years ago

    No, no, that’s the label. (We’ve got to do something about that boy’s lisp.)

  16. Load the rest of the comments (10).