Signe Wilkinson by Signe Wilkinson

Signe Wilkinson

Comments (23) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. omQ Release the Desaparecidos

    omQ Release the Desaparecidos said, over 1 year ago

    tch, silly bugger

  2. Rad-ish

    Rad-ish GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    Win at all costs.

  3. Sr NONliberal

    Sr NONliberal GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    Maybe instead of winning seven he should have stopped at 3?

  4. AshburnStadium

    AshburnStadium said, over 1 year ago

    Lance isn’t the only one. Why aren’t there asterisks besides the records of Barry Bonds?

  5. cdward

    cdward said, over 1 year ago

    @AshburnStadium

    Bicycling in particular would have a hard time finding any champion who isn’t juiced. But the bigger problem is the sick “Win at all costs” attitude that Radish alluded to – an attitude that distorts the purpose of sport in general and rubs off onto the rest of life – so that we see business/politics/religion etc as a game that must be won. Preferably by utterly destroying the other guy.

  6. zoidknight

    zoidknight said, over 1 year ago

    Before slamming Lance Armstrong, people should ask themselves why it took 8 years for a sample that repeatedly tested negative to test positive. Then they should ask why the same test tested negative to the samples from before and after it was taken. Then they should ask themselves how much France paid the USADA to doctor the sample.

  7. Michyle Glen

    Michyle Glen said, over 1 year ago

    I would like to see what “The Evidence” reveals?
    Over 8 Years to find a positive sample?
    Something stinks, who wants to bet the next Tour de France
    has fewer contenders?

  8. Jase99

    Jase99 said, over 1 year ago

    Before slamming Lance Armstrong, people should ask themselves why it took 8 years for a sample that repeatedly tested negative to test positive.

    The dopers are always trying to stay ahead of tests by using drugs and techniques that tests can’t yet detect.

  9. Respectful Troll

    Respectful Troll said, over 1 year ago

    When did sports commissions start saving testing samples in cold storage while testing methods improved?
    The Sword of Damocles hovers over the head of every athlete with a dirty sample waiting for the right test.
    Sadly,
    C.

  10. Archimedes

    Archimedes said, over 1 year ago

    I am shocked that Armstrong would cheat like that and then lie about it for all these years.

    That takes a lot of Ball.

    (credit to my brother for that one)

  11. Mhic Dhu Ghaill

    Mhic Dhu Ghaill GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    @Archimedes

    He was just better a stealth doping than all of the alsorans. And “balls?” yeah he has those too having beated testicular cancer.

  12. Tue Elung-Jensen

    Tue Elung-Jensen said, over 1 year ago

    @Respectful Troll

    Since quite a while. Just because its not mentioned doesn´t mean it doesn´t happen. Especially if there is strong enough doubt wether the test was actually false.

  13. Dredpiraterobt$

    Dredpiraterobt$ said, over 1 year ago

    @AshburnStadium

    Do you think Barry Bonds is ever going to be in the Baseball Hall of Fame?

  14. Night-Gaunt49

    Night-Gaunt49 said, over 1 year ago

    I don’t see shame here. I see the pernicious influence of the deadly and stupid Drug War in this. Now if Lance Armstrong had surgery that gave him an advantage they would not care. See the hypocrisy?

  15. Dredpiraterobt$

    Dredpiraterobt$ said, over 1 year ago

    @Night-Gaunt49

    Yes I see the hypocrisy, but I also see the distinction. If one has a surgery that grafts an extra set of muscles onto the leg, for example (or a support system for the spine) that surgery is not life threatening (beyond the risk of the surgery).
    .
    The steroids and chemicals these people are putting into themselves have a history of causing premature death. They also have a history of underaged abuse.
    .
    Surgery doesn’t have those issues. Beyond that there is technology that can grow new organs and tissue for patients and it is really only a matter of time before someone has additional meat that was put there, surgically.
    .
    My sense is that it will be “outlawed” and the other truth is that you won’t be able to hide the evidence.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (8).