Rob Rogers by Rob Rogers

Rob Rogers

Comments (14) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. ODon

    ODon said, 12 months ago

    Some of those cancelled plans were more likely to cover the rack than a EKG.

  2. Michael wme

    Michael wme said, 12 months ago

    The New York Times allowed one of their freelance writers, a 46 year old physician, to write that the ACA forced her to upgrade her policy, which will cost her almost $500 a month more than she was paying before her policy got upgraded (not a lot for a physician who is also a writer invited to submit lots of Times columns and who also has a popular book out). She is now required to pay for maternity coverage, with no deductible or co-pay, and also for coverage for any sex change operations she might want. And she’s not happy about it. But the comments to her column were that charging rich people with individual insurance policies an additional $500 a month will enable poor people to buy affordable insurance.


    But will it? Or will charging rich people with individual policies a lot just enrich the insurance executives?


    (No one has a clue as of current date.)

  3. Harleyquinn

    Harleyquinn GoComics PRO Member said, 12 months ago

    Obama said 85% liked what they had. So now that Obamacare has changed the rules on what you are allowed to have and people can not keep what they had, it is somehow the insurance’s fault? how does that transfer work? which is a bigger LIE? Switching to Obamacare will save a family 2,500 a year. Or 85% who liked what they had before Obamacare changed the rules, in July 2010, forcing those 85% into looking for new health care now that it is “law” They did not get to keep what they liked?
    Well if what they had was med evil then what does that make Obamacare? Prime Evil!

  4. Harleyquinn

    Harleyquinn GoComics PRO Member said, 12 months ago

    Well at least now the guy on the rack can get free hormone replacement or birth control pills. Thank you Obamacare.

  5. Enoki

    Enoki said, 12 months ago

    He’s going to be permanently waterboarded now like one of those “drinking birds” under his new Obamacare plan. It’s “better” haven’t you heard?!

  6. ConserveGov

    ConserveGov said, 12 months ago

    Umm…Hey Rob, minimal, catastrophic insurance is Exactly what most people in their 20’s want.
    But NO, you and Barry know what’s beys for these “immature idiots”. Right?

  7. Northern Redman

    Northern Redman said, 12 months ago

    0bama lied. Period.

  8. bowtiedaddy

    bowtiedaddy said, 12 months ago

    Elderly maternity leave coverage, Aromatherapy, more deductibles. That’s what we get for paying our own way.

  9. Enoki

    Enoki said, 12 months ago

    Truist, I tend to not get my news from comedians…

  10. msowards

    msowards said, 12 months ago

    @Harleyquinn

    You really twisted the facts! The real problem is the insurance companies.
    Going with this GOP designed health care proposed originally by Romney, who both were sure the Democrats would soundly reject it because it was a health care still based on private insurance was a shock and surprise to the GOP. Not only did they get the Dems to back something that would really benefits some of their biggest contributors, but when it goes bad it makes the GOP look good.
    What we all should have pushed for was and expansion of medicare to cover all US citizens and let people buy what ever extra coverage they want and then pay for most of the expansion on increased taxes on the insurance companies.
    Bur we’ll have to wait until the electorate realize the only way to have a healthy country is if we all are covered.

  11. Mr. Ngn33r

    Mr. Ngn33r GoComics PRO Member said, 12 months ago

    @Truist

    Unfortunately (?)…I believe there is no referendum procedure is available for Federal elections – only Constitutional Amendments

  12. echoraven

    echoraven said, 12 months ago

    @Truist

    Salon? Jon Stewart? Anything more credible like the National Enquirer, Mad Magazine or Cracked.com?

  13. 1BiGl3dFo0tS

    1BiGl3dFo0tS GoComics PRO Member said, 11 months ago

    @echoraven

    Those two “comedians” are among the more intelligent folks on the tube, Echo.

    The list of endless falsehoods coming from Hannity, et.al. on Faux News is proven and not refutable. Fact check sites have devoured much of what the Faux News folks try to pass as factual and given them the thumbs down so often that even second graders could understand that it is dangerous to begin to expect straight factual reporting from Hannity and friends.

  14. 1BiGl3dFo0tS

    1BiGl3dFo0tS GoComics PRO Member said, 11 months ago

    @NFLRedskins

    Want to do a side by side comparison of the results of fact-checking MSNBC and Fox News? MSNBC has a few folks who go into hyperbole at times and even make errors in facts, but Fox is an almost non-stop fantasy act. There is no equivalency in the accuracy of the two networks, Faux New fits them as a label, and opinionated news fits MSNBC fairly well.

    Go to the best fact-check sites and start counting.

  15. Refresh Comments.