Comments (19) (Please sign in to comment)

1. 

   Murphy224 said, 8 months ago

   Sounds as plausible as a “protest over a film that got out of hand” like the administration said.
2. 

   Radish said, 8 months ago

   White House spokesman Jay Carney said that President Obama views the attack on the U.S. consulate in Libya as a “terrorist attack.”
3. 

   masterskrain said, 8 months ago

   Wait a second…the Television is tuned to a station in Green Bay…
4. 

   mickey1339 said, 8 months ago

   @HOWGOZIT

   Now the authorities have arrested the filmmaker on probation violation for using a computer without asking his P.O. My, doesn’t that sound serious? Couldn’t be their feeble attempt to marginalize this stupid story about the film being responsible for the middle east violence? Another display of the administrations middle east appeasement policy.
5. 

   dtroutma said, 8 months ago

   the “ref thing” HAS gotten more coverage, and outrage from “the populace”, than events in the Middle East, including our little wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
6. 

   Radish said, 8 months ago

   @HOWGOZIT

   Gee howie, you mean it took a couple of days for the government to sort out a complex situation?
7. 

   Harleyquinn said, 8 months ago

   @Radish

   Radish the self marginalized said, about 10 hours ago
   White House spokesman Jay Carney said that President Obama views the attack on the U.S. consulate in Libya as a “terrorist attack.”

   2 weeks after the fact, after Obama went on Letterman and in front of the UN and told us it was a movie. Even if they knew withen 24 hours it was an attack. But of course Obama could not take that 3 am call.
8. 

   Harleyquinn said, 8 months ago

   @mickey1339

   “Now the authorities have arrested the filmmaker”
   Yet Bill Maher, 1 million $ Obama donor, is still free. His film was watched.
9. 

   disgustedtaxpayer said, 8 months ago

   @radish and other Obama apologists=
   -
   the date of the terrorist attack and assassination of the US Ambassador and 3 diplomatic employees was 9/11/12…on
   a Tuesday evening.
   -
   What was the date that Carney finally admitted that Obama “viewed the attack as terrorism”?
   -
   Obama used his UN speech to continue the LIE to the world that it was a video that was the cause of Muslim riots and attacks…
   -
   After 17 days, the FBI still is not on the scene in Benghazi!
   Why?
   IMO the Obama administration is stonewalling and blocking the revealing of evidence that will show that our diplomatic people were UNPROTECTED. The Marines at the Cairo consulate were not allowed to have ammo for their guns.
   This LIE campaign by the entire top of the administration is a COVER-UP until the election Nov. 6 is over.
   -
   The intelligence sources of the US government have said that they knew within 24 hours of the murders that it was Al Qaeda…and that the White House had been given that information.
   -
   what do you pro-Obama posters think is the reason for Obama, Hillary Clinton, Amb. Rice and others doing this very obvious deception?
10. 

    Michael wme said, 8 months ago

    @Radish

    I’m very happy to see that disgustedtaxpayer caught you in your lies. And, to stay on topic, he got all your lies checked by replacements from the Lingerie League of Fact Checkers. It has been reliably reported that people have been posting to Facebook that the officers in Cairo are not allowed to carry any weapons, and so were helpless as hundreds of Americans were killed by the Wisconsin Al Qaeda who travelled to Cairo by rafting that great river on which Cairo is situated, and it is widely published that they were assisted by Missouri Al Qaeda members Abu Huck and Al Jim.
11. 

    Molon Labe said, 8 months ago

    What is the best way to handle rioting muslims? Four little words. Napalm and cluster bombs.
12. 

    DrCanuck said, 8 months ago

    @Radish

    Not having watched TV 24-7, I may be in error and subject to correction, but I heard the Obama administration state,“We don’t yet have enough information on the issue and it’s not our policy to jump to conclusions; we’ll withhold judgment until we have enough evidence to say and then we will.” They had the info of the movie; they did not yet have evidence of planned terrorism.

    
    Geez, how like a liberal, huh. The conservatives came to a firm conclusion it was terrorism after a four second analysis.
13. 

    swr said, 8 months ago

    @Radish

    Well heven forfend that the President lose his beauty sleep and stay up to monitor the situation and act like a commander and cheif Then he wouldn’t be good “eye candy” for the girls on the View. Huumm wonder how Michelle feels about that.
14. 

    swr said, 8 months ago

    @DrCanuck

    Yes Dr. Quack, lets ignore that intelligence, not that you would have any famieriaty with that, on planned attacks on 9/11, let ignore the Ambaassadors own concerns, lets not have proper security,
    All found out in the last week just by checking the internet four for five time a day for 15-20 minutes at a time. Maybe if yous spent less time on DU, you might know the real story.
15. 

    Ms. Ima said, 8 months ago

    It’s the liberals attacking Republicans.
16. Load the rest of the comments (4).