Prickly City by Scott Stantis

Prickly City

Comments (20) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. exoticdoc2

    exoticdoc2 said, about 16 hours ago

    Caaaaaave! But I still don’t see the big deal of drawing a picture of a murderous, desert raider, lying, insane pedophile.

  2. Robert Tatro

    Robert Tatro said, about 12 hours ago

    Does anyone alive today know what he looked like?

  3. Cminuscomics&stories

    Cminuscomics&stories GoComics PRO Member said, about 11 hours ago

    Does anyone dead know what he looked like? I once sat down at a table with Saudis. That was not a welcoming experience.

  4. Darsan54

    Darsan54 said, about 9 hours ago

    @exoticdoc2

    Where are you getting the pedophile charge? I mean really? I haven’t seen anything about that in the biographies I’ve read. Or is that a “NO GO” zone with you?

  5. Darsan54

    Darsan54 said, about 9 hours ago

    @Cminuscomics&stories

    Pretty much the whole thing about no images is so followers wouldn’t worship it. There are lotsa images throughout history. It’s only the really conservative fundamentalist elements (read crazeee) that find this offensive. It’s not part of the doctrine.

  6. bpullin

    bpullin said, about 8 hours ago

    @Darsan54

    You must have read the liberal PC version, written so as not to inflame murderous muslims. Why do you think it is legal in their cult to have sex with and marry children of any age?

  7. Tue Elung-Jensen

    Tue Elung-Jensen said, about 7 hours ago

    I just don´t see the issue in drawing some guy you don´t even know what looked like.

  8. catzilla23

    catzilla23 GoComics PRO Member said, about 6 hours ago

    We have an idea of what many notables of Rome actually looked like due to death masks and sculptures, alas we have no idea what the notables of our major religions looked like. The Shroud of Turin seems to fall in the fake category, granted the upstate returns aren’t in yet but there is a preponderance of evidence against it.

  9. Kaffekup

    Kaffekup said, about 6 hours ago

    Watch out, I can see the top of His holy turban!
    In any case, it’s believed that as an old man he married a six-year-old named Aisha. So, in Alabama, not a pedophile :-).
    But when people start murdering in his name, clearly, they’re worshipping him, and not Allah.

  10. fbjsr

    fbjsr said, about 6 hours ago

    @Darsan54

    No, there is numerous writings about how viral he was and used to prove it with 8 and 10 year old virgins.

  11. Beau Nobo

    Beau Nobo said, about 5 hours ago

    In the paper, they just covered his face.

  12. zippy06

    zippy06 said, about 5 hours ago

    @Darsan54

    Maybe you should read the koran.
    Good muslims can marry 9 yr olds.

  13. zippy06

    zippy06 said, about 5 hours ago

    If a stone mason(George Washington) can carve an image on the Supreme Court Building……It’s okay.
    It’s all about that black building in Mecca and Idol worship and an excuse to cut off heads.
    like Pat Condell says it’s stone age superstitious BS.

  14. Dogday88

    Dogday88 GoComics PRO Member said, about 5 hours ago

    @fbjsr

    The word you meant, I believe, is “virile,” as opposed to “viral”, commonly used to describe the ubiquitous nature of inane pictures on the Internet. And, for the love of heaven, can we PLEASE consider “8 and 10 year old virgins” as a redundant statement??

  15. ottod

    ottod GoComics PRO Member said, about 4 hours ago

    @Dogday88

    Would it be less vile if they weren’t?

  16. Load the rest of the comments (5).