Pat Oliphant by Pat Oliphant

Pat Oliphant

Comments (19) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Fairportfan2

    Fairportfan2 said, almost 2 years ago

    “Starting”? When do they ever stop?

  2. ODon

    ODon said, almost 2 years ago

    @Fairportfan2

    I think Mitt can answer that question. ~~

  3. Wabbit

    Wabbit GoComics PRO Member said, almost 2 years ago

    It’s more strange that there are only as many verbal goofs as there are.

  4. hippogriff

    hippogriff said, almost 2 years ago

    1970s letter to the editor in Canada: " If Britain can hold an election in four weeks, why do we take six?" So they shortened it a month. So why does the US take forever?

  5. AlexanderTheGoodEnough

    AlexanderTheGoodEnough said, almost 2 years ago

    @Ms. Ima

    Sweet Ima, if that happens, then you’ll really have a freakout and end up the mayor of Trollville. As it is, if his recent inaugural is any indication (and we’ve still got “Hope”), Obama may just in fact start doing some serious leading. More power to him! Lookout Thugs!

  6. Rx71Wm29

    Rx71Wm29 GoComics PRO Member said, almost 2 years ago

    We are all waiting, breathlessly, for one of Mitt’s sons to throw his hat into the fray!

  7. filmsgraded

    filmsgraded said, almost 2 years ago

    @rightisright

    The TAKER NATION? You mean defense contractors, corporate farmers, and Rick Scott’s HCA?

  8. fritzoid

    fritzoid GoComics PRO Member said, almost 2 years ago

    @ReasonsVentriloquist

    “I don’t think Hilary will run. Her time passed. Our taste for “Historical firsts” is behind us. Baby Boomers have aged out. We’ll be looking for someone born in the ’70s, ’65 earliest.”


    I agree about Hillary, but I think the First Female President is still gonna be a big deal. I’m putting my money on Kamala Harris (currently California AG), but not in 2016. She’s only 48 at the moment, though, so she’s got time. Look for her to start making a national name for herself.

  9. edinbaltimore

    edinbaltimore GoComics PRO Member said, almost 2 years ago

    So why should cons have all the money? We need to change the tax code, but all the special interests say “Not My Deduction/Loophole”!

  10. edinbaltimore

    edinbaltimore GoComics PRO Member said, almost 2 years ago

    But Ms. Malkin would NEVER put any Republicans on her list. As I said, we need to reform the tax code. And if they “legally” cheated, then it wasn’t cheating! How many righties took advantage of the 2009 tax amnesty? Maybe that’s why we never saw any of Romney’s pre-2010 returns.

  11. Night-Gaunt49

    Night-Gaunt49 said, almost 2 years ago

    @hippogriff

    Why the USA does it differently? As you may know the Supreme Court ruled that money is speech. So open bribery is okay for elections here. And they don’t let anyone politic the last week before elections. Everyone gets the same shot at commercials and debates etc. They are making it hard for corruption to win.

  12. Night-Gaunt49

    Night-Gaunt49 said, almost 2 years ago

    @Ms. Ima

    I know you are fearful of a black man in the White House leading. So for you you get the best of both worlds —-complain about his leading then turn around and say he is lazy by not leading! You must have an extraordinary life like Walter Mitty.

  13. Night-Gaunt49

    Night-Gaunt49 said, almost 2 years ago

    @rightisright

    Why would he do that? He’s just the present face of the Plutocrats you brown nose for. D or R they will rule for them not us.

  14. thebaldtexican

    thebaldtexican said, almost 2 years ago

    Thank goodness Dem’s support background checks on firearms, but despise it for voting…. that Dog will be voting for Joe…

  15. edinbaltimore

    edinbaltimore GoComics PRO Member said, almost 2 years ago

    When the right can actually show the “voter fraud” they say exists on such a “massive” scale, then maybe Dems will go for “background” checks. But given the history of voter suppression in this country, I go for our current system. In all my Father’s years at the Board of Elections, there was just one case of voter fraud ever found. (1950-1990) And both Dems and Reps ran the board during that time.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (4).