Pat Oliphant by Pat Oliphant

Pat Oliphant

Recommended

Comments (30) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Fairportfan2

    Fairportfan2 said, 4 months ago

    “Starting”? When do they ever stop?

  2. ODon

    ODon said, 4 months ago

    @Fairportfan2

    I think Mitt can answer that question. ~~

  3. Wabbit

    Wabbit said, 4 months ago

    It’s more strange that there are only as many verbal goofs as there are.

  4. hippogriff

    hippogriff said, 4 months ago

    1970s letter to the editor in Canada: " If Britain can hold an election in four weeks, why do we take six?" So they shortened it a month. So why does the US take forever?

  5. Ms. Ima

    Ms. Ima said, 4 months ago

    I’m waiting for O to stop campaigning and start leading. I think I’ll be waiting for 4 more years.

  6. AlexanderTheGoodEnough

    AlexanderTheGoodEnough said, 4 months ago

    @Ms. Ima

    Sweet Ima, if that happens, then you’ll really have a freakout and end up the mayor of Trollville. As it is, if his recent inaugural is any indication (and we’ve still got “Hope”), Obama may just in fact start doing some serious leading. More power to him! Lookout Thugs!

  7. Richard S. Russell

    Richard S. Russell said, 4 months ago

    @hippogriff

    In Britain and Canada, they have elections when the government then in power decides to call them. Needless to say, that usually only happens when they think they’re going to win. It’s a prescription for inertia.
     
    In the US, it’s the calendar that governs, so we can literally tell when every election’s going to be for the next century, and the party in power can’t dodge one just because its popularity ratings happen to be down.

  8. Rx71Wm29

    Rx71Wm29 said, 4 months ago

    We are all waiting, breathlessly, for one of Mitt’s sons to throw his hat into the fray!

  9. rightisright

    rightisright said, 4 months ago

    @Ms. Ima

    Don’t worry, Ima, after Lord Ears declares himself President for Life in 2016, with the full support of TAKER NATION, we won’t have to vote ever again.

  10. filmsgraded

    filmsgraded said, 4 months ago

    @rightisright

    The TAKER NATION? You mean defense contractors, corporate farmers, and Rick Scott’s HCA?

  11. Adrian Snare

    Adrian Snare said, 4 months ago

    @Ms. Ima

    Our President has been leading for four years, or do you wish for him to lead people around by their nose, or their ears, as has been the practice.

  12. ReasonsVentriloquist

    ReasonsVentriloquist said, 4 months ago

    I like the dog’s response!
    .
    I’ve liked Joe in the past and I’ve disliked him when he was running against my candidate. He’s been an “I’m runnin!” guy (like Bob Dole or John McCain).
    .
    I like Joe fine now, but I hope he doesn’t run! The numbers are against the VEEP of a popular President getting the job. And two terms of it!
    .
    I don’t think Hilary will run. Her time passed. Our taste for “Historical firsts” is behind us. Baby Boomers have aged out. We’ll be looking for someone born in the ’70s, ’65 earliest.
    .
    Viet Nam (Viet what?) Viet Nam is as vague a collective memory today as the Depression was to children of 1972. It was something that grandpa brought up when he gave you a nickle to buy 10 cents worth of candy! Then he gave you the other nickle… thanks, grandpa!
    .
    The economy will have revived by 2016 and there will be lots of Dems looking to take the reigns. There will be plenty of “Me too” Republicans who will be trying hard to shake the legacy of the neocon era. The Dems will have two 8 year holds at the White House for having gotten us through the mindfield laid by the NeoCon “Starve The Beast” policy as people realize that we are in the same boat!

  13. DrCanuck

    DrCanuck said, 4 months ago

    I like Joe. Joe is cool.


    (Excellent article in this week’s Newsweek on his unknown talents.)

  14. fritzoid

    fritzoid said, 4 months ago

    @ReasonsVentriloquist

    “I don’t think Hilary will run. Her time passed. Our taste for “Historical firsts” is behind us. Baby Boomers have aged out. We’ll be looking for someone born in the ’70s, ’65 earliest.”


    I agree about Hillary, but I think the First Female President is still gonna be a big deal. I’m putting my money on Kamala Harris (currently California AG), but not in 2016. She’s only 48 at the moment, though, so she’s got time. Look for her to start making a national name for herself.

  15. rightisright

    rightisright said, 4 months ago

    @filmsgraded

    You forgot the google dorks and Dr. Dre’s rubbish, two more examples of obamabots with mega-dollars hidden offshore or in foreign tax shelters.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (15).