Pat Oliphant by Pat Oliphant

Pat Oliphant

Recommended

Comments (16) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Wally Rust

    Wally Rust said, almost 3 years ago

    T. Boone Pickens is right - convert to natural gas for all vehicles

  2. beenthere41

    beenthere41 said, almost 3 years ago

    Of course that’s what Pickens wants. He owns and operates NG fueling stations from Canada to Mexico with his company (Clean Energy Fuels Corp). If you don;t think he will monopolize the industry, here is what he had to say about water after he bought up the ground water rights in Roberts County, Texas: “‘I know what people say—water’s a lot like air. Do you charge for air? ‘Course not; you shouldn’t charge for water,. Well, OK, watch what happens. You won’t have any water.’”

  3. meetinthemiddle

    meetinthemiddle said, almost 3 years ago

    ^ He bought all those stations because he thinks $4/gallon gas will make a lot of people run to NG…

  4. Gary Kleppe

    Gary Kleppe said, almost 3 years ago

    Switching from one fuel to another isn’t going to solve the problem. We need to drive less and use more efficient public transportation.

  5. Simon_Jester

    Simon_Jester said, almost 3 years ago

    T’ain’t that simple. Getting a vehicle to run on NG ( and/or Propane ) requires some serious conversion. I once drove a company vehicle that could run on either one at the flick of a switch.

    In theory…in practice, these cars were constantly breaking down and developing leaks.

    I don’t think we’ve ever agreed on anything before, beenthere, but you’re dead right about T. Boone Pickens. He’s not just peddling natural gas, but also Snake Oil.

  6. W(ar).Crime

    W(ar).Crime said, almost 3 years ago

    ^I was watching Horsepower TV TRUCKS! and it seems that conversions are not that complicated (if you’re not mechanically challenged that is). The emissions on propane are a lot less than gasoline but its better than nothing. Plus 500 miles off of one tank of liquid propane on a TRUCK…That’s huge!

  7. jmattadams

    jmattadams GoComics PRO Member said, almost 3 years ago

    Keep talking, T. Boone! More natural gas now!

  8. Becca

    Becca said, almost 3 years ago

    I learned a saying: “Don’t eat where you sh|t, don’t sh|t where you eat.” Going after natural gas involves pumping hundreds of thousands of gallons of poisonous, toxic chemicals down around the aquifers to frack the rock to get the gas.

    Is it so important to get yet another fossil fuel that we must poison our water supply? Really?

  9. motivemagus

    motivemagus said, almost 3 years ago

    ^Or earlier. But I agree. Of course, as Larry Niven pointed out, a fusion plant is likely to be just short of a fusion bomb…

  10. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, almost 3 years ago

    I want a nuclear powered bicycle.

    Actually, we were running NG on an experimental basis in 1971. Handling liquified NG is NOT easy! Even today. NG is just another bullet in the cylinder of your Russian Roulette revolver. All these “stop gap” measures ignore that finite resources ARE finite!

    Exxon is saying we have a 100 year supply of NG in shale. Okay, “we” won’t be around at the end of that time, but what happens when THAT is gone too? Grandkids are just worthless little scabs, right?

  11. Rad-ish

    Rad-ish GoComics PRO Member said, almost 3 years ago

    How many MPG can you get with hemp oil?

  12. charliekane

    charliekane said, almost 3 years ago

    It’s all good.

    Donnie Trump’s gottit unda control!

    King Abdullah gonna find a, you know, horse’s head part in his bed. Ya know whatta mean.

  13. spyderred

    spyderred GoComics PRO Member said, almost 3 years ago

    In a lot of places in the west, there isn’t much by way of public transportation and taking cabs everywhere is a terrific expense too. But switching to a fuel source like NG just delays the consequences as it is a heavy polluter and is also a limited resource.

  14. s9999a

    s9999a GoComics PRO Member said, almost 3 years ago

    Isn’t the real problem the burgeoning population?

    Shouldn’t we just have fewer people?

    If we really went bonkers with our wars, maybe we could thin the herd….?

  15. Clark  Kent

    Clark Kent said, almost 3 years ago

    Exactly! There are seven billion people on this planet. That’s way too many. There should only be about 500 million, probably less. I’ve done my part, I had no children. I’m old and wont be here to see the you know what hit the fan when there’s no more oil, NG, or coal; not to mention clean drinking water or food of any kind.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (1).