Comments (15) (Please sign in to comment)

1. 

   wolfhoundblues1 said, 7 months ago

   Remember to change the rules so you can demonize the cancer survivor after the fact.
   He passed every test during all the races.
2. 

   Dale Netherton said, 7 months ago

   Join the media crowd regardless of the lack of evidence.
3. 

   masterskrain said, 7 months ago

   Lance WON those 7 Tours!
   PERIOD!
4. 

   Chillbilly said, 7 months ago

   Easy solution here. Just let them dope.
5. 

   thegreatack said, 7 months ago

   …with an *. (asterisk)
6. 

   Omnius said, 7 months ago

   Doping or not winning 7 Tour de France races was quite the feat. A shame that he wasn’t caught when he was winning, taking away his wins now seems more like sour grapes and the real cheat. I don’t bother watching that tour garbage anymore anyway.
7. 

   singlespeed said, 7 months ago

   Folks should read the report. ‘Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence’ in the immortal words of Rumsfield.

   Several of Lance’s former Postal teammates have never ‘tested’ positive either but have admitted to doping. Several of Lance’s former teammates have been busted for doping. Nearly every one of his rivals was busted for doping.

   Doping in professional cycling goes way back to the beginning when it was cigarettes, cocaine and wine, then it was methanphetamines and cocaine cocktails, then blood and HGH doping and lately EPO.

   Now that cycling has started to clean up its act and get tough on doping the record setting paces of the Lance era are down significantly.

   Of course…Lance’s choice to dope has nothing to do with his surviving cancer. But any fan of the sport, watching the 00s racing era knew it wasn’t clean. But to sit and deny Lance wasn’t doping is riding with your head between your legs.
8. 

   burleigh2 said, 7 months ago

   @wolfhoundblues1

   Didn’t they already do that when he left his wife of how many years that was with him through all the cancer treatments? :-o
9. 

   Rickapolis said, 7 months ago

   Go Lance, go.
10. 

    olfart said, 7 months ago

    Until I see evidence to the contrary, L.A. is still the winner.
    The desperate claims of a busted snitch are not evidence.
11. 

    charliekane said, 7 months ago

    As I unserstands it, the onliest way to compete on da level wit’ da othurs was ta cheet. . .
12. 

    ahab said, 7 months ago

    The “Sewer de France” will be the biggest loser. Why toon in?
13. 

    Dredpiraterobt$ said, 7 months ago

    They retested the blood taken from the earlier tests. the new technology shows absolutely that Lance was using EPO.
    .
    There is no question left here. Lance doped!
    .
    A little funny that a guy named Lance stuck needles in himself… Lance, needle…

    Too soon?
14. 

    Rickapolis said, 7 months ago

    Lance was a doper. The case is proved beyond doubt. Either it changes your opinion of him or it doesn’t.
15. 

    olfart said, 7 months ago

    Can’t argue with actual evidence. I still respect him for the good he has done, but he is not the athlete that he claimed.
16. Refresh Comments.