Michael Ramirez by Michael Ramirez

Michael Ramirez

Comments (16) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. snarky39

    snarky39 said, over 2 years ago

    Not enough in the DC area.

  2. Kaffekup

    Kaffekup said, over 2 years ago

    Sigh, more nonsense. Too bad that most of the evil businessmen who issue those pink slips are republicans.
    And rMoney would have had unemployment at 0% by now, if not lower, of course.

  3. Radish

    Radish GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    This cartoon was perfect, in 2008.

  4. Enoki

    Enoki said, over 2 years ago


    Tell that to the 5000+ Intel workers laid off about a week ago among others…

  5. jack75287

    jack75287 said, over 2 years ago


    No your wrong; Those businessmen are the ones who created the jobs in the first place?

    The majority of Americans now believe that the governments need to get out of the way to create more jobs.

    And the poll itself:

    Do you really believe that businessmen are evil?

  6. jack75287

    jack75287 said, over 2 years ago

    Read your article called “Why flat initial jobless claims are good news for mall REITs” REITS are Real Estate Investment Trusts. So let me get this straight, you who believe in the redistribution of wealth say Ramirez is wrong because one sector has benefited from the good fortune of the luxury purchases of the rich.

    Yes it talks about people start buying when they need to because of demand fine but with a 1\3 of a million new unemployment claim and some just falling off the work force you think this is a good thing.

    The two links I posted to Kaffekup above proves you wrong.

  7. jack75287

    jack75287 said, over 2 years ago

    Dude wasradar gave a good argument and you attacked him, sorry I forgot that is Tuesday for you.

  8. martens is REALLY fed up

    martens is REALLY fed up said, over 2 years ago

    I’d like to add this relating to Reasons for labor force reduction . The retirement of baby boomers was, according to some analyses, expected to result in a significant reduction in the labor force by 2014.

  9. snarky39

    snarky39 said, over 2 years ago

    When all wages go up, it is usually accompanied with an across the board increase in prices. We called it inflation when I took econ (got an A, BTW). It’s a great way to trim down the impact of paying off the trillions of dollars in debt accrued by this administration.

  10. Radish

    Radish GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    In another sign of improving labor markets, businesses announced only 30,623 job cuts in December, the lowest number in more than 13 years, according to a report by Challenger, Gray & Christmas.

    The drop in pink slips isn’t just a one-month phenomenon. The report says layoffs have been dwindling for most of the year. For all of 2013, only 509,051 layoffs were planned, says Challenger, the lowest number since 1997.
    September 2008 – 432,000 jobs lost
    October 2008 – 489,000 jobs lost
    November 2008 – 803,000 jobs lost
    December 2008 – 661,000 jobs lost

  11. jack75287

    jack75287 said, over 2 years ago


    Yes job cuts are down, but what does that mean when this many people are out of work, maybe they can’t lay anymore off till there is less demand.

  12. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    Economy still isn’t doing great in my county, unemployment is still at 10%, but during the Bush years, it ran from 22 to 38%, and the current numbers are NOT those who stopped looking, they’re folks who finally found jobs. We still need more jobs to bring back retail stores, and it’s hard to create good production jobs when your transportation system sucks because they took out infrastructure (railroads), and you’re remote.

  13. ARodney

    ARodney said, over 2 years ago


    The GOP has done a good job of blocking all economic expansion. Blocking the unemployment insurance alone is killing 300,000 jobs this year, according to the CBO and Bloomberg, and the incomprehensible GOP-forced shut down last fall knocked .3% off of economic growth.

  14. snarky39

    snarky39 said, over 2 years ago

    I never made a claim that one manufacturer would be advantaged or disadvantaged. What I said is that it would result in inflation. Your example of an increase in aluminum costs would similarly lead to inflation.
    It would seem your philosophy/logic grade was in the lower quintile, too. Or was it your reading grade?

  15. martens is REALLY fed up

    martens is REALLY fed up said, over 2 years ago

    swr, if you are going to refute my post (which had a link to real data) you must yourself post real data or a link to real data. Otherwise, all you are doing is spouting off and there is no reason for the rest of us to take your spouting seriously.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (1).