NFP: You said, “Again, punishing criminals and making them serve their sentences is just too much for the Liberal’s sensitivities to handle…”
There is no evidence that this is true. You provided no evidence. You construct a strawman, then attack that strawman. If you say that you’re NOT lying; that you DON’T know that what you’re saying is not true, that means that you’re talking out your rear. So, you’re either lying or you admit to just repeating what you hear (gullible).
harleyquinn says: “Identification with and understanding of another’s situation, feelings, and motives. See Synonyms at pity.”
Which is not the same as sympathy, which is what you’re trying to say Obama is looking for in a judge.
“Another’s situation laid out in facts belong. The motive? Yes”
That’s empathy.
“But feelings and Pity?”
And that’s not. Here, read this. It might help.
http://www.lvrj.com/opinion/45249747.html
Empathy is not a valid basis for justice. Empathy *is* a valid basis, however, to understand the facts of the cases and the legal meanings of the laws with which to render that “blind justice” you alluded to.
NFP: You said, “Again, punishing criminals and making them serve their sentences is just too much for the Liberal’s sensitivities to handle…”
There is no evidence that this is true. You provided no evidence. You construct a strawman, then attack that strawman. If you say that you’re NOT lying; that you DON’T know that what you’re saying is not true, that means that you’re talking out your rear. So, you’re either lying or you admit to just repeating what you hear (gullible).
harleyquinn says: “Identification with and understanding of another’s situation, feelings, and motives. See Synonyms at pity.”
Which is not the same as sympathy, which is what you’re trying to say Obama is looking for in a judge.
“Another’s situation laid out in facts belong. The motive? Yes”
That’s empathy.
“But feelings and Pity?”
And that’s not. Here, read this. It might help.
http://www.lvrj.com/opinion/45249747.html
Empathy is not a valid basis for justice. Empathy *is* a valid basis, however, to understand the facts of the cases and the legal meanings of the laws with which to render that “blind justice” you alluded to.