Matt Wuerker by Matt Wuerker

Matt Wuerker

Comments (10) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. mrs1wing

    mrs1wing GoComics PRO Member said, over 3 years ago

    God help us all…

  2. mrs1wing

    mrs1wing GoComics PRO Member said, over 3 years ago

    God help us all…

  3. Wabbit

    Wabbit GoComics PRO Member said, over 3 years ago

    I thought the GOP never met a war it didn’t like. Thank God they DON’T like this one.
    Now Obama needs to stop listening to Kerry and think about how the American people and the whole International community are against this!!

  4. Rockngolfer

    Rockngolfer said, over 3 years ago

    AOL did an unscientific survey and 70% of AOL users voted against war.

  5. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, over 3 years ago

    We haven’t had a “good” war, at least with real justification, since WW II. (Korea was a “police action” and there WAS and actual invasion by the north, and there is still no actual “peace treaty”, only a cease fire.)


    “Humanitarian” actions, that kill additional people, aren’t as humanitarian, even if killing FEWER people, than diplomatic solutions. Hmm, Iran/Contra was also about a civill war, and Reagan’s side LOST that one, hmmm, Viet Nam?

  6. Robert Landers

    Robert Landers said, over 3 years ago

    @dtroutma

    While I am indeed against a war itself, there is a slight problem with just doing nothing. That is, that IF Assad and his military really did use chemical weapons against even his own people, then does doing nothing about this then encourage such actions in the future? Especially by such dictatorial regimes in such places as the Middle East? And can any reasonable civilization of mankind then allow such actions to continue, unopposed and unabated? Further, just what is to stop such people from using even worst weaponry, such as biological agents, or even nuclear weapons? Would diplomacy, or even sanctions, without actual military action actually stop such horrors from happening? Personally, I must admit that there are no easy answer to such questions. But, is doing absolutely nothing in the way of military action the answer?

  7. pbarnrob

    pbarnrob said, over 3 years ago

    Sooo, what would happen if say the UN voted to Turn Their Backs (even literally!) on Assad; NO assistance of any kind, don’t return his phone calls, total shunning, embargo.
    How long can he hold his breath?

  8. Caligulla

    Caligulla said, over 3 years ago

    Whoever said “War is Hell” underestimated War. The trick with Hell is that you KNOW its forever. With War there’s aways the need to fracture the mind so you don’t dwell on the chances of becoming a casualty. It lacks the certainty of Hell, and this, in a very real way, makes it worse.

  9. wmconelly

    wmconelly said, about 3 years ago

    Talking about the situation IS doing something: it’s putting off the likelihood that Assad the Monster will gas his people again anytime soon. And THAT would have been one of the purposes, perhaps THE purpose, of Barry’s bombing. So maybe Obama’s caution has given the country (and the world) the best it’s gonna get out of a lousy situation, perhaps the best it COULD get… Just saying.

  10. Rymlianin

    Rymlianin said, about 3 years ago

    “There is only one party in the United States, the Party of Property… and it has two right wings: Republican bull-goose loonies and Democrat Alfred E. Neumans.

  11. Refresh Comments.