Matt Wuerker by Matt Wuerker

Matt Wuerker

Comments (16) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Rickapolis

    Rickapolis said, almost 4 years ago

    To the GOP, the word bipartisan means giving them everything they want and getting nothing in return, Which, by the bye, is why they lost the election. Except for the far right extremists everyone is catching on. Angry white men are on the way out. It’s the 21st century. Time to join us.

  2. StCleve72

    StCleve72 said, almost 4 years ago

    Groucho sings the Republican response to the S of the U:

  3. Nabuquduriuzhur

    Nabuquduriuzhur said, almost 4 years ago

    re: night-gaunt

    of course. They began to return the favor. Since the late 1990s, it’s been “my way or the highway”. Senator Dashiell, for example, was called “the Great Obstructor” because he did over 100 filibusters and not one of them could be considered to be based on principle. Right and wrong didn’t enter his calculations, as evidenced by such matters as Homestead Mining, where the public was left a mess.
    The polarization between the parties is now almost complete. It’s one thing to compromise on unimportant things. How does one compromise with good and evil? And so each time the Democrats in the last four years came up with their latest idea to destroy the culture, it resulted in a wall. No government can function for long that way.
    A historic parallel of infighting between principle and moral evil is France in 1939-1940. The president of France saw the danger, tried to take various steps to get his nation ready, but was stopped by petty garbage every step of the way by those without morals. He tried to resign more than once, exasperated. The rest is history: when Germany invaded, France was not ready.

  4. ThePupUnbound!

    ThePupUnbound! said, almost 4 years ago

    He left out curing cancer and walking on water…something for next year?

  5. corzak

    corzak said, almost 4 years ago

    “Be bipartisan? Are you kidding? Obama tried that for four years, enough already!”

    You’re absolutely correct. The rest of the world is moving and changing. The US has a lot of work to do stay in the game.

    The Republican party has made it very clear that they want no part in governing. Want no part in investing in the future. Fine. Let them go off to Glennbeckville and argue among themselves about birth control, protecting white male sensitivities, black panthers in Benghazi or whatever.

    The rest of us have a lot of work to do.

  6. pirate227

    pirate227 said, almost 4 years ago

    You reap what you sow, Dumb(o).

  7. SABRSteve

    SABRSteve said, almost 4 years ago

    What’s so fanatic about a group of folks who are alarmed at a National Debt of $16.5 trillion, $58.2 trillion in Total Debt, and $122.7 trillion in US Unfunded Liabilities? I’m not a Tea Party person, but I do get what they are concerned about.

  8. paytonb

    paytonb said, almost 4 years ago

    Obama was never bipartisan in any way shape or form. Why do so many list to the right and left wing mouthpieces and completely ignore what’s actually going on in front of them??

  9. paytonb

    paytonb said, almost 4 years ago


    And where exactly is the compromise from the left coming?? People in this country are so blinded by their own partisan views and beliefs that they can’t see the forest for the trees. Bottom line, other than a few middle roaders from each party, neither side wants to or is willing to compromise on anything. The sooner people realize that the sooner they’ll get smart and start shedding these idiotic labels.

  10. paytonb

    paytonb said, almost 4 years ago

    The world is about compromise Eryx. Anyone who thinks they have all the answers is usually the one with the least. Nobody “wants” to compromise on things they feel are right but without it nobody gets anywhere. It’s really as simple as this. Two people are rowing a boat, one thinks they should row in synchronization while the other feels alternating is best. Both methods have their pros and cons but if they choose not to compromise they get nowhere. By compromising and switching from one method to the other neither gets it exactly the way they believe it should be but at least they make it to the other side of the river. Why is this concept so hard for people to understand?

  11. SABRSteve

    SABRSteve said, almost 4 years ago


    How old are you, ten?

  12. SABRSteve

    SABRSteve said, almost 4 years ago

    We’ve added 6 or so trillion to the debt since obama came into office, what did we get for our money? We should have started with infrastructure.

  13. SABRSteve

    SABRSteve said, almost 4 years ago


    It seems that you lefties are the angry ones.

  14. thebaldtexican

    thebaldtexican said, almost 4 years ago

    one instance of O being bipartisan? crickets…

  15. paytonb

    paytonb said, almost 4 years ago

    Rebuilt the economy?? You can’t be serious..

  16. Load the rest of the comments (1).