Comments (27) (Please sign in to comment)

1. 

   Radish said, 5 months ago

   Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.
2. 

   ODon said, 5 months ago

   More words for you to eat.
3. 

   Kylie2112 said, 5 months ago

   And the Republicans will, once again, nominate someone who has no credibility or is another nutjob and get trounced (again).
4. 

   Clark Kent said, 5 months ago

   Please run palin-bachmann in 2016. Or gingrich-rove.
5. 

   MortyForTyrant said, 5 months ago

   You must get your numbers from the same source as Karl Rove prior to election night. She has a 67% approval rating and it’s still climbing after the smack-down she gave those GOP senators on Benghazi…
6. 

   ARodney said, 5 months ago

   Howie and conservegov, you must be getting your news from Breitbart or Karl Rove or some other fact-free zone. She has not ruled out running in 2016. Saying that she is not currently running, is of course not the same thing. NO ONE is currently running for president in 2016. It requires forming an exploratory committee, and I expect a number of Democrats, Republicans, and third-party candidates will eventually be running.
   .
   Oh, and she currently is one of the most popular women in America, and the most popular secretary of state since polls were started. So “most disliked and phony” only applies to the conservative bubble, not to America itself.
7. 

   ossiningaling said, 5 months ago

   @HOWGOZIT

   Do you have a CNN link for that? I’ve only heard vague responses.
8. 

   ronald rini said, 5 months ago

   Sorry when she said I talked to bill and he said he had not had sex with that woman and I believe him. That meant she is stupid or she thinks we are stupid that we would believe her. How about the 6 mill they collected to pay for thier court cost (when she was crying because of the court cost we are going broke)did they every pay any of that money back before they brought thier 3 mill mansion.
9. 

   ansonia said, 5 months ago

   Amen.
10. 

    ansonia said, 5 months ago

    @ossiningaling

    “Look, I’m flattered. I am honored,” she [Hillary] told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer last April, when asked about the chorus of Democrats who want Clinton to make another bid for her party’s presidential nomination. “That is not in the future for me, but obviously I’m hoping that I’ll get to cast my vote for a woman running for president of our country.”
    .
    http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/01/29/hillary-clintons-new-2016-answer/
11. 

    ansonia said, 5 months ago

    @ARodney

    “Howie and conservegov, you must be getting your news from Breitbart or Karl Rove or some other fact-free zone. She has not ruled out running in 2016. "
    .
    hahahah.
    Maybe you shouldn’t be so fast to attack the news sources of others. Yours obviously isn’t so great.
    .
    http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/01/29/hillary-clintons-new-2016-answer/
12. 

    MortyForTyrant said, 5 months ago

    You are right! It was actually 69%, not 67%. And this is from a Murdoch publication…

    -

    The Wall Street Journal
13. 

    onguard said, 5 months ago

    The league of “Special Prosecutors” awaits Hillary, Jobs will be created.
14. 

    DrCanuck said, 5 months ago

    ConserveGov said,“… she is one of the most disliked and phony politicians of all time”.

    
    Which is, of course, why she has a 67% approval rating from Americans.

    
    (Just another story Republicans tell each other to make themselves feel better….)
15. 

    Robert Landers said, 5 months ago

    @onguard

    Yeah, and they would be just about as successful as the last group was, that could get absolutely nothing on either of the Clinton s while spending some $40 million of the taxpayers money even trying!

    So you are for government wastefully spending your tax dollars after all, glad to hear it!!
16. Load the rest of the comments (12).