Comments (18) (Please sign in to comment)

1. 

   J. Short said, 8 months ago

   The Emperor has no clothes.
2. 

   Randy_B said, 8 months ago

   @J. Short

   …but the conspiracy nuts have plenty of foil.
3. 

   Harleyquinn said, 8 months ago

   Obama tried to say Mitt wanted 5 trillion in new dept. Mitt shut him down all 3 times.
   All I keep hearing is “He lied” what are we on the playground again? Really, put up something real that has some facts with it. This taunt of “He lied” is just as pathetic as Obama performance.
4. 

   Harleyquinn said, 8 months ago

   http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/08/harvey-rosen-obama-campaign_n_1948615.html?utm_hp_ref=elections-2012

   OOPSSSS who is a liar?
5. 

   Davepostmp said, 8 months ago

   Trickle down economics doesn’t work. it’s a popular idea, but has no basis in fact.
6. 

   Night-Gaunt49 said, 8 months ago

   @Harleyquinn

   Rosen’s conclusion that Romney’s tax plan is mathematically possible rests on a questionable assumption: namely that Romney’s tax cuts for the rich would lead to robust economic growth. In fact, economic growth sharply slowed during the Bush administration, when President George W. Bush cut taxes for the rich. Brad DeLong, economics professor at the University of California at Berkeley, also notes that President Ronald Reagan’s tax cuts for the rich did not lead to much stronger economic growth either.
   
   A number of analysts, including those at the Tax Policy Center, have found that Romney’s tax plan would have to raise taxes on the middle class in order to be mathematically possible. But Rosen may not be in that category. His analysis first would need to separate middle-class families from rich families for us to know.
   -
   Thanx Harleyquinn as usual you don’t read what you send us very closely and it tends to trip you up in the finer points of your argument.
   -
   Both Romney & Ryan ’s plans will cost the tax payer, the poor not the rich, and will add up to trillions of extra dollars in debt.
7. 

   lifebyc said, 8 months ago

   @Night-Gaunt49

   She’s a piece of work, but at least she’s TRYING to find something to read that supports what she already believes. A few months back it was just parroting Rush.
8. 

   phritzg said, 8 months ago

   @Night-Gaunt49

   You have to remember that Mitt thinks people making up to $250,000 a year are middle class. I doubt that the vast majority of Americans would agree with him on that. As of 2011, there were only about 6 million Americans who made more than $200,000 a year, according to the Tax Policy Center. This is the top 4.2% of all taxpayers.
9. 

   terrencio said, 8 months ago

   obama better get his crap in gear
10. 

    ttbone said, 8 months ago

    @phritzg

    You have to remember that Obama also thinks that the people making up to $250,000 a year are the middle class. $250,000 has been defined for years as the cutoff between upper and middle class.
11. 

    mdavis4183 said, 8 months ago

    Obama LIED. Romney called him on his lies. Obama’s still telling the same lies. Factcheckers say their lies. Obama’s going down.
12. 

    Blackwolff9 said, 8 months ago

    @ttbone

    You also must remember that there are subdivisions within each class:lower-lower,middle-lower,upper-lower,etc. I think it’s safe to say that a large portion of America falls between at least middle-middle and lower middle.
13. 

    Tigger said, 8 months ago

    .Fact Checkers also proved Obama lied, the difference, Romney called Obama out on his lies, and Obama did not call out Romney’s Lies.

    Obama tossed more BS than Romney.

    Liberals cannot admit what Obama has already admitted.. Romney wone Round One.
14. 

    muskox54 said, 8 months ago

    when you have nothing positive to show the county,because you have accomplished nothing, you try to show the negatives of your aponent.
    The President couldn’t and the Vice President just tried to laugh it off.
    Your collective Goose is cooked.
    or is that gooses or geese,,,,whatever its over
15. 

    muskox54 said, 8 months ago

    @Night-Gaunt49

    Obama has no vested interest in improving the economy if re-elected in that he knows the clock just ticks down to zero over the next 4 years.
    He is then protected for the remainder of his life at the expence of the country.
    At least someone new would try to keep the office open for 8 years and ANTYHING is better than NOTHING which is what the current presendent has accomplished.
    Just saying.
16. Load the rest of the comments (3).