Jeff Danziger by Jeff Danziger

Jeff Danziger

Comments (22) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Colonel Claus

    Colonel Claus said, over 2 years ago

    And people looked….

  2. Nos Nevets

    Nos Nevets said, over 2 years ago

    that’s all Danziger saw, huh?

  3. beautifulyoli

    beautifulyoli GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    Oh this was sooooo true! What a bunch of nothing this man spews. Again, Jeff Danziger hits the nail on the head.

  4. Newshound41

    Newshound41 said, over 2 years ago

    I usually agree with Danziger but not this time. Paul raised some legitimate concerns.
    Has the POTUS exceeded his authority?
    Are the rights of American people violated?
    Has the Congress abrogated its own powers regarding declaration of war?
    These are important questions all Americans should be concerned about.

  5. ahab

    ahab GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    Change the filibuster law now,end GOP obstruction.

  6. Colonel Claus

    Colonel Claus said, over 2 years ago

    Don’t y’all know that a filibuster is great as long as you are the one fillibustering?
    If its someone else, then we need to vote the fool outta office.

  7. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    I respect that Rand actually stood up and spoke as is supposed to happen with a filibuster, but can’t buy his TEA party arguments, especially as “W” killed over 5,000 Americans with phony, illegal wars, which he did NOT actually get “permission” from Congress to start in the manner he did, by ignoring their demand in the “War Powers Act” to sill prove necessity for that final attack option.

    But yes, change the filibuster rule to mandate Paul’s actions, and stop the over 200 “filibusters” McConnell called under “revised Senate rules”.

  8. I Play One On TV

    I Play One On TV said, over 2 years ago

    I believe the filibuster to be a quaint and pretty useless addition to the governmental bag of tricks, but I can appreciate its usability under much more limited circumstances than it is being used now.

    I would like to suggest a compromise: keep the filibuster, but return to the original rules: the person initiating the filibuster must talk, and continue to talk, until either he stops and the filibuster abruptly ends, or a cloture vote is passed. You don’t need to talk on the subject. Indeed, in the good old days, many legislators talked about their to-do list, or laundry products, or anything else, just to keep the filibuster going.

    Now that we have C-Span, and people like Jon Stewart, who are willing to show us snippets of how the people’s business is being “conducted”, the public wouldn’t be likely to stand for the delay tactic, unless the legislation being filibustered deserved it.

    Nowadays, all you have to do is say, “I filibuster”, and we go from a need for a simple majority to 60 votes. Regardless of the party who uses it, there is not significant risk to careers to continue to use it, so it will be abused, regardless of party, until the old rules are restored.

  9. jeffcollier

    jeffcollier said, over 2 years ago

    Stop whining for whining’s sake. It’s a FILIBUSTER for cryin’ out loud. If all you get is “look at me”, who cares?

  10. Justice22

    Justice22 said, over 2 years ago



  11. Rockngolfer

    Rockngolfer said, over 2 years ago


    Democrats claim republicans started 385 filibusters which is way more than in any previous terms.

  12. mac47

    mac47 said, over 2 years ago


  13. Uncle Joe

    Uncle Joe GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    Rand Paul was making a good point: does the Administration believe they have the authority to kill an American Citizen, on American soil, without due process? I’m not satisfied with the Administration’s response, which was, basically they would not order a strike against an American who was,“not engaged in combat on American soil.”

    That begs the question, what do they consider “engaged in combat”?

    It should go without saying that this nonsense started with the Patriot Act.

  14. Bruce4671

    Bruce4671 said, over 2 years ago

    This is about the most ridiculous question there is. OH where were you when…well where were YOU? Did you picket? Do you write your reps? Well????

    So because YOU screwed up and let another president get away with something you STILL say is unconstitutional (oh yeah and I AGREE) you want to ask those taking the same stand YOU took with righteous indignation against one president where they were then? It isn’t then, it’s NOW. So why are you not standing up for the constitution NOW with the rest of us? Nope, you’d rather downgrade the problem, minimize what has just compounded the things you and I fought against years ago.

    Divide and conquer. That si what Obama is doing to the American people. And doing it well.

    I;m glad I’m old and on the way out.

  15. Bruce4671

    Bruce4671 said, over 2 years ago

    Speaking of a knee jerk criticism. Yours of Casey.

    There was one, uno, eins democrat that stood with RAnd Paul in filibuster. ONE. Out of 53. Yes, some asked questions but only ONE joined.

    What do you think Doc? Does the democrat party in the USA care about upholding the oath they took when taking office? Or will the continue to step aside as the have for too many years and not confront the one man sitting in the white house?

  16. Load the rest of the comments (7).