Jeff Danziger by Jeff Danziger

Jeff Danziger

Comments (27) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Colonel Claus

    Colonel Claus said, over 1 year ago

    And people looked….

  2. Nos Nevets

    Nos Nevets said, over 1 year ago

    that’s all Danziger saw, huh?

  3. beautifulyoli

    beautifulyoli GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    Oh this was sooooo true! What a bunch of nothing this man spews. Again, Jeff Danziger hits the nail on the head.

  4. Newshound41

    Newshound41 said, over 1 year ago

    I usually agree with Danziger but not this time. Paul raised some legitimate concerns.
    Has the POTUS exceeded his authority?
    Are the rights of American people violated?
    Has the Congress abrogated its own powers regarding declaration of war?
    These are important questions all Americans should be concerned about.

  5. ahab

    ahab GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    Change the filibuster law now,end GOP obstruction.

  6. Colonel Claus

    Colonel Claus said, over 1 year ago

    Don’t y’all know that a filibuster is great as long as you are the one fillibustering?
    If its someone else, then we need to vote the fool outta office.

  7. Michael wme

    Michael wme said, over 1 year ago

    Every patriotic American knows that the President only kills terrorists. Any time, any place, for any reason or for no reason. Executive orders say that not one single innocent has ever been killed, and this is supported by Congressional resolutions and the Supreme Court.


    Anyone like Rand Paul who wants to restrict the US President’s right to kill anyone, any time, any place, for any reason or for no reason is a traitor who supports the terrorists. The President’s job is to kill every man, woman, and baby terrorist, regardless of race, religion, or national origin. And people like Rand Paul who filibuster and get in the president’s way are endangering every single American.


    And the president has absolute, irrefutable proof that every man, woman, and baby killed was a heinous, criminal terrorist, but that irrefutable proof is Top Secret, and so can never be shown to anyone except the President.

  8. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    I respect that Rand actually stood up and spoke as is supposed to happen with a filibuster, but can’t buy his TEA party arguments, especially as “W” killed over 5,000 Americans with phony, illegal wars, which he did NOT actually get “permission” from Congress to start in the manner he did, by ignoring their demand in the “War Powers Act” to sill prove necessity for that final attack option.


    But yes, change the filibuster rule to mandate Paul’s actions, and stop the over 200 “filibusters” McConnell called under “revised Senate rules”.

  9. I Play One On TV

    I Play One On TV said, over 1 year ago

    I believe the filibuster to be a quaint and pretty useless addition to the governmental bag of tricks, but I can appreciate its usability under much more limited circumstances than it is being used now.

    I would like to suggest a compromise: keep the filibuster, but return to the original rules: the person initiating the filibuster must talk, and continue to talk, until either he stops and the filibuster abruptly ends, or a cloture vote is passed. You don’t need to talk on the subject. Indeed, in the good old days, many legislators talked about their to-do list, or laundry products, or anything else, just to keep the filibuster going.

    Now that we have C-Span, and people like Jon Stewart, who are willing to show us snippets of how the people’s business is being “conducted”, the public wouldn’t be likely to stand for the delay tactic, unless the legislation being filibustered deserved it.

    Nowadays, all you have to do is say, “I filibuster”, and we go from a need for a simple majority to 60 votes. Regardless of the party who uses it, there is not significant risk to careers to continue to use it, so it will be abused, regardless of party, until the old rules are restored.

  10. jeffcollier

    jeffcollier said, over 1 year ago

    Stop whining for whining’s sake. It’s a FILIBUSTER for cryin’ out loud. If all you get is “look at me”, who cares?

  11. Justice22

    Justice22 said, over 1 year ago

    @dtroutma

    Ditto

  12. Rockngolfer

    Rockngolfer said, over 1 year ago

    @dtroutma

    Democrats claim republicans started 385 filibusters which is way more than in any previous terms.

  13. masterskrain

    masterskrain GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    BUT…How many Right Wing Conservatives complained when Shrub and Ashcroft nuked the Bill of Rights in the first place with the so-called “Patriot Act”??

  14. mac47

    mac47 said, over 1 year ago

    #StandwithRand

  15. Uncle Joe

    Uncle Joe GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    Rand Paul was making a good point: does the Administration believe they have the authority to kill an American Citizen, on American soil, without due process? I’m not satisfied with the Administration’s response, which was, basically they would not order a strike against an American who was,“not engaged in combat on American soil.”

    That begs the question, what do they consider “engaged in combat”?

    It should go without saying that this nonsense started with the Patriot Act.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (12).