Comments (18) (Please sign in to comment)

1. 

   Homer D. Poe said, 3 months ago

   Video proof is the best kind for ufos and e.t.s
2. 

   Bruno Zeigerts said, 3 months ago

   Just like the footage of Bigfoot … wearing a wristwatch.
   Or the Loch Ness Monster … a fake monster on a surfboard.
   Or one picture of a UFO that turned out to be a blurred image of of a Cessna….
   Is the alien too short to have fired the beam through the window? The hole was higher than that head … and it would have had to travel straight across… fired by the alien, the hole in the wall would have been higher than the one in the window.
3. 

   Michael McMillan said, 3 months ago

   +1. Bruno’s right, the alien isn’t tall enough. Think about it— if you’re using a hand-phaser, you’ll tend to have the gun not much higher than your shoulder when firing. Probably a bit lower, actually. Second, I have a problem with the concept of an alien traveling 4 billion light years just to “off” one man, shooting and missing, then returning home. He would have finished the job. He might have used the armament on his ship to vaporize the house.
4. 

   c001 said, 3 months ago

   @Michael McMillan

   What do you know about the alien’s anatomy and the construction of his weapon? How many of his heads are not in the picture? Does his gun look like an earthling’s one?
5. 

   BartJ385 said, 3 months ago

   The window is very low to the ground; the alien would be only 2,5 ft – but half of that would be his head! I don’t think that is the clue we are looking for; I guess Werner just didn’t pay much attention to the way he drew the window.
6. 

   Robert Danielzik said, 3 months ago

   How can the dear Inspector know that the alien is not build like a flat dachshund? And that it was not a shoulder/back mounted cannon that is higher than the aliens head?
   Assuming the size of the alien is the clue.
7. 

   voluspaa said, 3 months ago

   Standing outdoors in Wednesday’s strip, rain is falling towards the left. Seen from indoors in the footage of the supposed alien, this would be towards the right – but this is not the case, rain is seen here falling in a leftward direction too. This proves that the footage is a fake. It also proves that in a Danger strip whenever it’s raining, rain is part of the solution.
8. 

   SeaFox10 said, 3 months ago

   With all our HD cameras around these days, how come UFO’s and BigFoot photos are always blurry?!
9. 

   Raijin said, 3 months ago

   None of the footprints outside the window appeared to be FACING the window. Unless the alien’s feet are REALLY odd and point in a really weird direction!
10. 

    Raijin said, 3 months ago

    Also, with that much rain, surely the footprints would have been less clear, and if there was some type of spacecraft, the craft would have sunk much deeper into the wet ground..
11. 

    WytZox1 said, 3 months ago

    Right on, Inspector! Never accept videos as proof of ET-aliens or Bigfoot or Loch-Nessie. If they’re not captured alive it’s prob’ly a hoax.
12. 

    TravelerMarjorie said, 3 months ago

    When the Inspector first arrived at the scene, there was no rain. The rain apparently started after the supposed crime was committed. How could he have a video of the alien in the rain?
13. 

    Michael McMillan said, 3 months ago

    @c001

    I might know quite a bit about alien anatomy. On a couple of other forums, I’m an undocumented space alien, so it kinda goes with the territory. Besides, anybody who has watched enough “Star Trek” or who has ever fired a gun knows something of how you handle the weapon when firing it.
14. 

    JoviusGM said, 3 months ago

    Say, where’s the fuschia-colored spaceship model? It was against the window in Tuesday’s strip, and now it’s not there in the camcorder frame.
15. 

    voluspaa said, 3 months ago

    @TravelerMarjorie Actually it’s been raining all along, check again.
16. Load the rest of the comments (3).