Inspector Danger's Crime Quiz by Werner Wejp-Olsen
- February 02, 2013
- Previous feature
-
- Next feature
- Current

Register for a FREE GoComics account and get this plus any other comic strip delivered to your Personalized Comic Page, Daily. With a free account you will be able to build a Comic Page filled with the Comics you want to see each day.
With the largest collection of Comics and Editorial Cartoons online there is plenty to choose from. Upgrade to a GoComics Pro account (Only $.99/Month) and have unlimited archive access to decades of comics.
Customize Homepage
Daily Comics Email
Comment, share, interact with other comic fans
INSPECTOR DANGER’S CRIME-QUIZ Do you love whodunit-mysteries? Are you a Columbo-fan? Would you like to be a detective too? Here’s your chance. The comic strip “Inspector Danger’s Crime-Quiz” by Werner Wejp-Olsen, world-renowned cartoonist, is a crime-puzzle challenging armchair sleuths of both genders and all ages to activate their Sherlock Holmes-gene to figure out the right solution and solve the case. The main characters are the tough and rough Inspector Danger, all criminals’ worst nightmare, and Alfie, his dim-witted assistant and still a rookie after seven years on the force. In just a few panels, a whole mystery plot is being presented with a number of suspects and clues for the reader to check out and by deduction come up with the right solution to the crime. These mysteries span from cold-blooded murders, safecracking and bank robbery to art thefts, kidnapping and every now and then even a Peeping Tom – all presented with a humorous twist. But in each strip – in each case, the reader has all the suspects and clues needed to come up with the right answer – and as a safety devise – a solution (printed upside down - sorry!).
DISCLAIMER All characters appearing in this comic strip are fictitious. Any resemblance to the real world, real crime scenes and actual criminals is purely coincidental, unintentional and not to be taken too literally.
To quote a famous Grook by Piet Hein:
“Taking fun as simply fun
and earnestness in earnest
shows how thoroughly
thou none of the two discernest.”
By the way - no animals were harmed during the production of this comic strip.
Werner Wejp-Olsen - All Rights Reserved.
Copyright © 2013. Universal Uclick, All rights reserved. Terms & Conditions - Privacy Policy

Comments (19) (Please sign in to comment)
Rod Gonzalez said, 4 months ago
Of course!
paha_siga said, 4 months ago
Of course! It is a good idea to shoot everyone who has forgotten to return your lawn mower! They will SO remember next time!
Hmm… now that reminds me… my neighbours haven’t returned that bowl I once gave them strawberries in. What kind of crime would be suitable for a bowl? It’s a lot smaller than a lawn mower so I guess murder is out.
RackDaddy said, 4 months ago
He could have offered him some bbq and gotten his lawn mower back. Nobody can turn down good bbq.
BartJ385 said, 4 months ago
I love the motive, but I don’t think the whiners will understand that Werner wrote that just to screw with them.
Anyways, the solution is no good (again). The time frame goes: victim shot, found, police called, waiting for CSI guy, interviewing four other neighbours first – that is easily more than an hour. So the BBQ guy could be innocent – he really could have come home long after the shot and still would have had more than enough time to fire up the BBQ.
So all we have is that he says “ten minutes”. That can’t be true, of course, but maybe he just doesn’t realize how long he has been at it already.
Homer D. Poe
said, 4 months ago
Pretty risky move – guys who don’t return lawnmowers are usually survivalists with bunkers and an armory
Tue Elung-Jensen said, 4 months ago
@RackDaddy
But why should he give something more to get something back he allready owned?
Crispy Bacon
said, 4 months ago
At least an hour? That’s some slow burning charcoal.
happytinkerbelle
said, 4 months ago
I love this show “Lawn And Order”.
SeaFox10 said, 4 months ago
That’s why I use gas! Kill the neighbor, fire it up! ;D
Maddy Wii said, 4 months ago
Then why continuing to interview the rest?
WytZox1 said, 4 months ago
I solved this yesterday … but the motive was pretty lame. Murdering over a borrowed lawnmower?!?!?!?!?!?
Robert Danielzik said, 4 months ago
@paha_siga
You disembowl him of course.
TKogon said, 4 months ago
“The secret’s in the sauce.”
Michael McMillan said, 4 months ago
No. No. No. No. No.
Even now you don’t have diddly, you only have proof— if that— that the barbecuer was home at the time of the murder. You still have the job of placing him at the crime scene, placing the gun in his hand and so on. About that “ten minutes”— when you’re barbecuing you’re not necessarily watching the clock all that close. If you and your family are having a good time half the day may go by and it seems like “ten minutes”.
Remind me not to move to Inspector Danger’s neighborhood. They murder each other over loaned lawn mowers. I’d hate to see what happens if you borrow a snow blower.
Michael McMillan said, 4 months ago
The gardener would still be a suspect too, under this reasoning. Go back and look: Do you really believe he dug all that up in only fifteen minutes from the time he got home? Consider: You park the car, go inside to get your work clothes, go to your garage/toolshed and get your shovel and start digging. Just the prep takes most of that fifteen minutes and I see a lot of ground has been turned. So, both the gardener and the barbecuer have been home long enough to have heard the gunshot—- but that’s all that can be proved with just that.