Inspector Danger's Crime Quiz by Werner Wejp-Olsen
- November 05, 2012
- Previous feature
-
- Next feature
- Current

Register for a FREE GoComics account and get this plus any other comic strip delivered to your Personalized Comic Page, Daily. With a free account you will be able to build a Comic Page filled with the Comics you want to see each day.
With the largest collection of Comics and Editorial Cartoons online there is plenty to choose from. Upgrade to a GoComics Pro account (Only $.99/Month) and have unlimited archive access to decades of comics.
Customize Homepage
Daily Comics Email
Comment, share, interact with other comic fans
INSPECTOR DANGER’S CRIME-QUIZ Do you love whodunit-mysteries? Are you a Columbo-fan? Would you like to be a detective too? Here’s your chance. The comic strip “Inspector Danger’s Crime-Quiz” by Werner Wejp-Olsen, world-renowned cartoonist, is a crime-puzzle challenging armchair sleuths of both genders and all ages to activate their Sherlock Holmes-gene to figure out the right solution and solve the case. The main characters are the tough and rough Inspector Danger, all criminals’ worst nightmare, and Alfie, his dim-witted assistant and still a rookie after seven years on the force. In just a few panels, a whole mystery plot is being presented with a number of suspects and clues for the reader to check out and by deduction come up with the right solution to the crime. These mysteries span from cold-blooded murders, safecracking and bank robbery to art thefts, kidnapping and every now and then even a Peeping Tom – all presented with a humorous twist. But in each strip – in each case, the reader has all the suspects and clues needed to come up with the right answer – and as a safety devise – a solution (printed upside down - sorry!).
DISCLAIMER All characters appearing in this comic strip are fictitious. Any resemblance to the real world, real crime scenes and actual criminals is purely coincidental, unintentional and not to be taken too literally.
To quote a famous Grook by Piet Hein:
“Taking fun as simply fun
and earnestness in earnest
shows how thoroughly
thou none of the two discernest.”
By the way - no animals were harmed during the production of this comic strip.
Werner Wejp-Olsen - All Rights Reserved.
Copyright © 2013. Universal Uclick, All rights reserved. Terms & Conditions - Privacy Policy

Comments (15) (Please sign in to comment)
mrbribery said, 7 months ago
what the hell? how do we know know what car doesn’t have a jack? and why do the wheels look like they came off Fred Flintstone’s car.
Wolind Quark said, 7 months ago
The picture at the bottom is just misleading! Makes it look like it’s necessary.
Of course, that’s what makes it a good problem. Unnecessary info is good for that.
Tue Elung-Jensen said, 7 months ago
@mrbribery
You aren’t meant to solve these things. Just be dumbfounded by the sheer idiocy :p
c001 said, 7 months ago
@Wolind Quark
yes, nice red herring
Michael McMillan said, 7 months ago
I thought we were supposed to be able to figure it out by the clues. The only way to figure this one out would have been to (a) know that the thief used his own jack and (b) to be able to look in each car’s tool kit to see which one is missing the jack. In the meantime, I have some questions for the tire inventor.
davidf42 said, 7 months ago
This is lame. I was looking to see which car had a bad tire.
Sardonis said, 7 months ago
@Tue Elung-Jensen
EXACTLY!
Sardonis said, 7 months ago
And on top of all that, 28 minutes to amass at least 5 cars? Wouldn’t that require warrants? This strip never surprises me with its stupidity.
rightisright said, 7 months ago
I’m telling you, folks, this strip is a prank on the masses, THAT IS ITS PURPOSE.
However, because it’s often bereft of logic, it invites vigorous debates and some hilarious one-liners, therefore it has high entertainment value, HOWEVER UNINTENDED.
kemaher said, 7 months ago
I don’t get it. Guess I just go with it…whatever “it” is.
Jim Kleinhans said, 7 months ago
@Sardonis
Warrants? Warrants? We don’t need no steenking warrants.
voluspaa said, 7 months ago
Here’s an alternate solution: if it was dark and with the headlights of the Novox in that position, there is no way Baldy could have made out anything from the license plate at all, so he just made something up. In fact it was meant to be a (new) case of insurance fraud spolit by Danger’s untimely appearance.
DenverGirl said, 7 months ago
I think I may have to edit this off my list. I’m a college graduate and love mysteries and puzzles, but these are just unbelievably stupid.
Fiendly Neighbourhood Terrorist said, 7 months ago
If his new tyre is so great, how come he was changing it? And I don’t see an abandoned tyre jack lying on the road either.
susanwobb said, 6 months ago
@Fiendly Neighbourhood Terrorist
He wasn’t changing the tyre — the thief was trying to steal it. The abandoned jack is not lying in the road, it’s still holding up the car after the thief went on the lam.