Inspector Danger's Crime Quiz by Werner Wejp-Olsen
- August 16, 2012
- Previous feature
-
- Next feature
- Current

Register for a FREE GoComics account and get this plus any other comic strip delivered to your Personalized Comic Page, Daily. With a free account you will be able to build a Comic Page filled with the Comics you want to see each day.
With the largest collection of Comics and Editorial Cartoons online there is plenty to choose from. Upgrade to a GoComics Pro account (Only $.99/Month) and have unlimited archive access to decades of comics.
Customize Homepage
Daily Comics Email
Comment, share, interact with other comic fans
INSPECTOR DANGER’S CRIME-QUIZ Do you love whodunit-mysteries? Are you a Columbo-fan? Would you like to be a detective too? Here’s your chance. The comic strip “Inspector Danger’s Crime-Quiz” by Werner Wejp-Olsen, world-renowned cartoonist, is a crime-puzzle challenging armchair sleuths of both genders and all ages to activate their Sherlock Holmes-gene to figure out the right solution and solve the case. The main characters are the tough and rough Inspector Danger, all criminals’ worst nightmare, and Alfie, his dim-witted assistant and still a rookie after seven years on the force. In just a few panels, a whole mystery plot is being presented with a number of suspects and clues for the reader to check out and by deduction come up with the right solution to the crime. These mysteries span from cold-blooded murders, safecracking and bank robbery to art thefts, kidnapping and every now and then even a Peeping Tom – all presented with a humorous twist. But in each strip – in each case, the reader has all the suspects and clues needed to come up with the right answer – and as a safety devise – a solution (printed upside down - sorry!).
DISCLAIMER All characters appearing in this comic strip are fictitious. Any resemblance to the real world, real crime scenes and actual criminals is purely coincidental, unintentional and not to be taken too literally.
To quote a famous Grook by Piet Hein:
“Taking fun as simply fun
and earnestness in earnest
shows how thoroughly
thou none of the two discernest.”
By the way - no animals were harmed during the production of this comic strip.
Werner Wejp-Olsen - All Rights Reserved.
Copyright © 2013. Universal Uclick, All rights reserved. Terms & Conditions - Privacy Policy

Comments (11) (Please sign in to comment)
simpsonfan2 said, 10 months ago
Neighbors called cops, they would probably know if wife had left or not, so maybe he could get the warrant. But they’d have to watch the car until they did get it.
simpsonfan2 said, 10 months ago
And maybe the fight was about him having a girlfriend on the side, so we would then have someone to stripsearch.
Kuldip Rai said, 10 months ago
At least this time the strip mentions whether something was a lucky guess or not. That should hopefully stop the people who think it incredulous how Danger always gets his (wo)man
Magician19 said, 10 months ago
This was clever. I thought it was because there was no empty place in the closet where a coat had been removed, but the lack of a nager is better. The coat in the hall is hanging on a coat-peg, so no hanger is needed.
Sardonis said, 10 months ago
Stupid. So, this guy killed his wife and stuck her in the trunk in broad daylight? AND he has neighbors?
stingray74 said, 10 months ago
Why does Inspector Danger always look like he has a hangover?
CrypticWizard said, 10 months ago
@stingray74
It’s just a ruse to make the criminals think he’s not as smart as he is.
Benndayy85 said, 10 months ago
Danger WAS drunk. He’s speaking the Bad Guy’s lines in the last panel. Where’s Alfie when you really need him?
mrbribery said, 10 months ago
I think it’s Alfie’s line in the last panel. Alfie’s merely practicing his ventriloquism.
takkycat said, 10 months ago
Hey! I usually have a million hangers strewn about. I guess its time to plan the murder…
joe piglet said, 10 months ago
The argument was about the wife having 4x as many coats as the guy. Stop spending money! Then the guy gets off, no search warrant for the car so the body is not admissible as evidence.