Glenn McCoy by Glenn McCoy

Glenn McCoy

Recommended

Comments (27) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. DavidGBA

    DavidGBA said, about 1 year ago

    Not a drone with a passenger/pilot.

  2. Walking_Man_Comics

    Walking_Man_Comics GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    gosh—and this’s SO likely! (not)

  3. nusbickel

    nusbickel said, about 1 year ago

    Someone tell FLOTUS to put her bra back on, NOW.

  4. Stipple

    Stipple said, about 1 year ago

    @nusbickel

    This makes about as much sense as the toon so I will not complain, but the comment does puzzle me.

  5. omQ Release the Desaparecidos

    omQ Release the Desaparecidos said, about 1 year ago

    What a strange cartoon. It’s as if the cartoonist is trying to deliver the punchline after no-one has understood it.

  6. warjoski

    warjoski GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    @Stipple

    Look at the cartoon closely, about the eight o’clock position. One of the congresswomen has taken off her bra to throw on stage.

  7. Wraithkin

    Wraithkin said, about 1 year ago

    While it is amusing, it’s really not… relevant. Meh. Swing and a whiff Glenn

  8. Rockngolfer

    Rockngolfer said, about 1 year ago

    The Borowitz Report says that Rand Paul gave his rebuttal to the State of the Union this morning, 12 hours early.
    (satire alert)

  9. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    The drones, Benghazi, bras, Keystone, jobs, debt, and now distress at ENDING our wars, the cons will blow up any distraction from the fact that they screwed the American people, with Reaganomics, wars, deregulation, and seizure of our rights with such as the “Patriot Act” (not), and “Military Commissions Act”, that led to such as drones and arguments that things are “legal” because of laws Republicans wrote, and Republican Attorney’s General and their clone drones wrote “legal opinions” (not the same a laws) on to give Reagan and then the Bush boys that “unitary presidency” Cheney was so enthralled with.


    McCoy, and all the “conservatives” need to wake up and smell some roses. Okay, the stench of the Reagan Bush years, and Boehner/McConnell still fill the room, and Rubio will come on to be the new JIndal, with a new “pile of wisdom” to drop on the public.

  10. jack75287

    jack75287 said, about 1 year ago

    His Narcissism knows no bounds.

  11. Tue Elung-Jensen

    Tue Elung-Jensen said, about 1 year ago

    @Walking_Man_Comics

    Would be kind of cool though.

  12. Gypsy8

    Gypsy8 said, about 1 year ago

    An armed drone too. The temptation may be just too great.

  13. Rad-ish

    Rad-ish GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    McCoy has a cartoonish grasp of reality.

  14. NebulousRikulau

    NebulousRikulau GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    @Gypsy8

    Considering the approval rating Congress has,
    there might be Much Rejoicing. yay.

  15. Wraithkin

    Wraithkin said, about 1 year ago

    @dtroutma

    Trout, please don’t lump all Conservatives into the label “conservatives” (in your context). Just like I don’t lump you in with all Liberals. Let me piece apart the arguments (I have) against your statement.

    Drones were never used to assassinate Americans in the past, especially without any sort of legal justification. Why is the ACLU having to sue the White House to have those justifications made public? Probably because they violate the US Constitution. You compare the “legal opinions” to the Bush and Reagan presidencies, but here’s the difference: They made them public. The current POTUS and crew are keeping them hidden.

    Benghazi was a travesty of (in)action by our state department and its periphery. 7 hours, 4 requests later, and they still couldn’t deploy jets that were 1 hour away. But they are just 4 people, why bother, right? How can Obama justify their deaths, and defend those who dicked the dog on this one? How can he look the families’ in the face and tell them that it was okay for their loved ones to die?

    Don’t get the bras comment.

    Keystone creates American Jobs. It’s that simple. The states which it would affect have already come up with plans to bypass the aquifer. The plans are ready to go right now. So why hasn’t he signed off on the pipeline? It would create tens of thousands of jobs. If he was serious about creating jobs, he would sign off on it. So does that mean his inaction means he is not serious about creating jobs?

    Jobs is why our country is still suffering a 1.5% annual GDP growth. It’s why the real unemployment rate is still in the low teens. It’s why the labor participation rate is the lowest it’s been in next to forever. I would consider it something he should be devoting the entirety of his significant political capital towards, and I don’t mean spending more on “investments” into the infrastructure. He needs to find a way to spur private sector jobs. Spending more clearly isn’t the answer, otherwise we’d already be seeing millions of jobs created after the 5+ trillion we’ve already dumped out our collective asses in the past 4 years.

    The debt is more of a ticking timebomb that has to be dealt with. I feel if we have spending restraint, coupled with job growth, and we will see this become a non-issue. But long-term it has to be dealt with, or it will sing our country. All the doves out there may think that wars and the military are the reason we have deficit spending. However, in 12 years (iirc), we are going to have our ENTIRE budget consumed by Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security. That means anything NOT those programs will be deficit spending, and adding to the debt. Tell me how this is something we want.

    For me the distress about ending the wars is not about the actual end. It’s about how he’s doing it. He is telegraphing his moves. He is saying, “we’re leaving at this time!” You honestly think this is a wise strategy? You claim to have served in the military. You can’t tell me that’s strategically sound. All that does is cost our troops lives. If we did, instead, a quiet draw-down, the enemy won’t know we’re pulling out until we’re already gone. They can’t make a statement on our way out, advertising that they “kicked us out.” It’s foolish.


    If you think Reaganomics hurt Americans, then why did we have unstopped growth during and after his presidency? If it was so bad for us, why did the standard of living across the country go up, as opposed to the Obamanomics we see now and how standard of living has stagnated or gone down? I resent the fact that liberals believe fiscal conservatism and self-reliance is the root of the evils in this country.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (12).