Glenn McCoy by Glenn McCoy

Glenn McCoyNo Zoom

Comments (24) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. comyics

    comyics said, almost 5 years ago

    Ah. Thanks for clearing that up Glenn McCoy.

  2. markagoodman

    markagoodman said, almost 5 years ago

    narrow minded, and as always poorly drawn FTFY

  3. omQ R

    omQ R said, almost 5 years ago

    I think Obama was really looking for a particular someone’s arse to kick.

    Oy, Tony….

  4. Alteri

    Alteri GoComics PRO Member said, almost 5 years ago

    How about the bleeep that refuses to consider alternative energy?

  5. Bruce4671

    Bruce4671 said, almost 5 years ago

    And who would that be Alteri? We all agree that alternative energy needs to be explored and developed. Do you have a way to use it NOW so we can …like…. pull the plug on fossil fuels and plug into solar or wind? NO????

    So how long do you think it will take to get there? What are we to do in the mean time? Who is going to R&D the project? How much is it going to cost? Who is going to pay for it?

    By all means Alteri, step up to the plate and get ‘er done.

  6. Cynthia

    Cynthia said, almost 5 years ago

    BP is a private company. They want the proffits? They should take the risks. That’s free market.

  7. Harleyquinn

    Harleyquinn GoComics PRO Member said, almost 5 years ago

    Bruce they are just waiting for Obama to appoint another card carrying commi to be our green job czar. He will bring about a new age of green jobs that will save us all. Of course in the mean time they want to pull the plug on what does drive the USA right now. They shutter at the idea of one of the cleanest greenest power sources in Nuclear Energy. They want solar and wind. Funny thing I want solar and wind also but I know you are not going to rely on it. Plus I would rather have a nuclear power plant then a wind farm in my back yard.

  8. millerdunwoody

    millerdunwoody said, almost 5 years ago

    “BP is a private company. They want the proffits? They should take the risks. That’s free market.”

    Well put, Frog. As you know, the current move among Republicans is for the taxpayers to pick up some if not all of the cost of the cleanup. I can hear it now: “Americans need oil and they need BP, so it’s in our national interest for Americans to do their part to solve this problem.” In other words, capitalism creates an economy that requires petroleum, fights tooth and nail to keep it that way against all interests to the contrary, and then wants to stick us, a captive audience, with the bill when things go wrong. That’s so banal and criminal that it doesn’t even merit the joke that these people are all closet socialists.

    As usual, Glenn McCoy gets it backwards. It’s obvious who really needs a kick in the ass–after Glenn himself, of course.

  9. alcors3

    alcors3 said, almost 5 years ago

    O is convoluted to kick his own. But then he might talk funny.

  10. disgustedtaxpayer

    disgustedtaxpayer said, almost 5 years ago

    Our Founding Fathers did not create the job of “president” for a Do-Nothing Speechmaker to abuse and accuse others!

    Did the DNC really set out to elect the personification of the Party Mascot…..a dumb, stubborn Mule?

    Where is any evidence the nation is benefitted by superior deeds by this Oval Office “First Kicker”?

  11. Bruce4671

    Bruce4671 said, almost 5 years ago

    Miller, IMO you remark is slightly off center. From what I have heard, it has been suggested that we not withhold our business from BP because if there are no profits there is no money for repair and clean up. That is a business positon not a taxpayer funded cleanup.

    Now, IF the government saddles all petroleum companies with an increased tax to fund a cleanup fund , then that IS a taxpayer funded cleanup. WHY? Because then the oil companies can pass that “fee” onto the consumer.

  12. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, almost 5 years ago

    Only about 10% of ON SHORE leases currently out there, are being explored or in production, and they KNOW where the oil is. They WANT to get ANWR to get access to “protected” lands, as in refuges, National Parks, or maybe your mother’s grave site, so they have it ALL!

    On shore is also NOT spill proof, the North Slope has had repeated spills, and the Alaska pipeline is older than the average American car on the road- think about it. The infrastructure of our roads and pipelines is of concern- there were TWO gas pipeline explosions last week alone.

    Why DO Americans still resist fuel efficient vehicles or mass transit– more ads from BP telling us how “cool” they are.

  13. Libertarian1

    Libertarian1 said, almost 5 years ago

    The alternative future is natural gas and nuclear energy. N2N.

  14. davesmithsit

    davesmithsit said, almost 5 years ago

    Hydrogen IS the future but I think they’er afraid that people will start to produce and use their own and thus avoid the taxes. After all refrigeration tech. has been around for a long time.

  15. Jade

    Jade GoComics PRO Member said, almost 5 years ago

    Spill proof on-shore drilling. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/05/26/alaska-pipeline-spill-site-faced-problems-drew-proposed-fine-inspectors/

    ^ Those “water” cars are cool. :D

  16. Load the rest of the comments (9).