Comments (22) Jump to Comments Form

1. 

   ben_david said, 1 day ago

   Since when does Planned Parenthood care about parental consent for ANYTHING?

2. 

   dtroutma said, 1 day ago

   If she’d just held an aspirin between her knees, she wouldn’t be prego?

   Planned Parenthood, and family planning, is a lot more than abortion taken as final option; but condoms, care, current options, and common sense are also banned by the very folks who condemn abortion. THAT is the biggest part of the problem.

   We had a daughter, son, and vasectomy- all planned, and all a sign of both love, and intelligence.

3. 

   eaglesofwar said, 1 day ago

   Condoms are readily available at Wal-Mart and all gas stations.

   If someone wanted to utilized them they are available.

4. 

   ANandy said, 1 day ago

   Just make children wards of the state. That’s the liberal template.

5. 

   HOWGOZIT said, 1 day ago

   As Rodney Dangerfield said to his pregnant blind date–the next time you have a fight with your boyfriend have him knock you down instead of up.

6. 

   fritzoid said, 1 day ago

   ben_dover said: “Since when does Planned Parenthood care about parental consent for ANYTHING?”

   Their whole raison d’etre is to help those who do not consent to be parents…

   ANimbecile said: “Just make children wards of the state. That’s the liberal template.”

   Did you forget your teleprompter? You’re straying off-message. The liberal template is to encourage teen pregnancy so Obama can satisfy his lust to kill babies.

7. 

   Ken Warren said, 1 day ago

   Conservatives care about children until they’re born, then they are on their own.

   Oh, I’m sorry, I forgot Conservatives don’t want childrens minds warped by any talk or information on SEX, inculding discussion on what sex is, what is happening when they go through puberty, and how to prevent pregnancy.

   It is a myth that there is a home for every baby born to an unwed mother. The truth unless someone in the girls family takes the baby and raises it, many children will spend their lives in foster homes, or orphanages.

8. 

   fennec said, about 24 hours ago

   The thing that really frosts me about this ‘toon is depicting an 8-month pregnant teenager as getting an abortion. This is so intellectually dishonest that it drives me round the bend.

9. 

   eaglesofwar said, about 24 hours ago

   partial birth abortion.

10. 

    DrCanuck said, about 22 hours ago

    Never let the facts get in the way of a good agenda.

11. 

    scottfreitas said, about 22 hours ago

    No, intellectually dishonest is pretending abortion isn’t the murder of a human being. You have to ignore religion, science, “common” sense (no longer common thanks to the removal of the judeo-christian worldview from western culture), personal observation, recorded History, and a plethora of laws pertaining to people still in the womb.

    That last mass-murdering abortionist who was shot—Tiller the baby killer–did nothing BUT late-term abortions. More than 5,000 of them during his lifetime. Around 72% of those were for women more than 7 months pregant, with the remainder being for woman at least 6 months pregant.

    You Leftists can keep paroting Satan’s lies all you want. In the end, you will reap what you have sown.

12. 

    ben_david said, about 19 hours ago

    I never have understood why liberals are okay with late- (and even post- ) term abortions of innocents, but they want to let murderers live out their lives in moderate comfort, watching cable TV and getting better food than millions of homeless.

13. 

    tjdestry said, about 14 hours ago

    The other lie is getting an abortion without parental consent or the permission of a judge. That last part is conveniently left out by wackos who feel pregnancy is God’s punishment for sin.

14. 

    fritzoid said, about 11 hours ago

    Partial-birth and late-term abortions are radical measures used in radical cases. When they are performed, it’s because there’s serious risk to the life of the mother.

    When Roe vs Wade was passed, it said that on-demand abortions in the first and second trimester cannot be prohibited, and third-term abortions cannot be outlawed but they can be regulated.

    No sane person says “Well, let’s put off the abortion until as late as possible.” The earlier it’s done, the less invasive the procedure and the less risk of complications.

    And again, the procedure doesn’t result in the death of a human being. The only human beings in the room are the doctors/attendants and the pregnant woman.

15. 

    countrymike said, about 8 hours ago

    For or against, you do have to laugh or cry at the hypocrisy.

16. 

    HOWGOZIT said, about 8 hours ago

    DrC–way to quote the Dem Party.

17. 

    scottfreitas said, about 7 hours ago

    Fritzoid bald-faced lied. Even a few of the stories in the mainstream media about George Tiller, that late-term abortionist who was killed, pointed out that what made Tiller such a target of pro-lifers for so many years was the fact he did late-term abortions on perfectly healthy women. They were abortions of CONVENIENCE, same as almost 100% of all other abortions.

    And denying the humanity of an unborn child–especially a fully-developed one who has to be forcibly held inside the birth control in order to be killed–goes beyond beyond intellectually dishonest straight into the realm of the sociopath. :/

18. 

    Corosive Frog said, about 3 hours ago

    If anyone here wants to have a sane discussion (anyone?) I suggest you watch the episode “fetal position” of the House, MD tv series. It is both emotional (almost like the righties want it) and based on medical factshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FetalPosition(House)

19. 

    Corosive Frog said, about 2 hours ago

    One more thing, no woman shoves wires in her genitals out of convenience.

20. 

    scottfreitas said, about 1 hour ago

    Any woman who does such a thing has allowed her own selfishness to so consume her that she has become a monster. I always wonder why Leftists use the coat-hanger story to try and drum up SYMPATHY? Being with child isn’t a disease, or a curse, or some dread malady. The idea that producing a being created in God’s image is so horrid that one must shove pieces of metal inside one’s body to try and destroy it… uh, no. I don’t get it, corosive. A sane, compassionate response would be to reason with the woman, make her understand that the person inside of her is not going to “destroy her life” unless she is living a life so ugly that it NEEDs to be destroyed, in order that a better, less self-obsessed life can replace it.

    That’s the problem with trying to reason with women in a feminist culture. Feminism is more than anything a religion of SELF; a religion where the entire universe must be made subservient to your every whim, lest you be forced to think of the needs of others. It is a religion where Self is elevated to Godhood, and men are relegated to being at best uneasy competitors in a 60/40 female-dominated relationship, or at worst the hated enemy who must be politically subjugated…

21. 

    Corosive Frog said, 18 minutes ago

    No woman wants to spend her life being spit on by people like you either. To conservatives, they are either murderers or sluts depending on the state (smart ones realize that no matter what they do, people like scott would still look down on them, so why should they make the effort?). Can’t blame them for taking the easy way out.

22. 

    Corosive Frog said, 15 minutes ago

    If God wanted procreation to be a man’s responsability, he would have made men pregnant.