Gary Varvel by Gary Varvel

Gary Varvel

Comments (43) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. SuperMax52

    SuperMax52 said, about 19 hours ago

    Over the past decades the Constitution has become the joke that the Socialists wanted it to be. RIP Amerika 1776-2007

  2. beckinista

    beckinista said, about 18 hours ago

    @SuperMax52

    Amen.

  3. echoraven

    echoraven said, about 18 hours ago

    Is this in reference to 1 particular ruling?

  4. Darth Vader

    Darth Vader GoComics PRO Member said, about 18 hours ago

    The Supreme Court only interprets the laws Congress created. Perhaps Congress should be more explicit in the way they author said laws then there wouldn’t be so much to have to interpret.

  5. moderateisntleft

    moderateisntleft said, about 17 hours ago

    @SuperMax52

    2007, isn’t that the year the conservatives brought us the Patriot Act? yes, the death of America…

  6. wmconelly

    wmconelly said, about 17 hours ago

    If you can’t win by shootin’, win by lootin’. That your idea of democracy, Varvel? You checked out the ‘Will of the People’ lately? It’s out there, no matter your latest memo from Ailes & Murdoch.

  7. Elvoyce Hooper

    Elvoyce Hooper GoComics PRO Member said, about 16 hours ago

    Throw out the principle of following the plain language of the document and the original intent of the drafters and you are in a poker game where the rules are constantly changing. So says Walter Williams.

  8. 3pibgorn9

    3pibgorn9 GoComics PRO Member said, about 16 hours ago

    And I suppose you interpret the Bible literally and that every word is dictated by God.

    The Constitution, like Scripture, is open to interpretation and always has been since the time of John Marshall.

  9. leftwingpatriot

    leftwingpatriot said, about 15 hours ago

    I’m sure Gary Varvel would have drawn the same cartoon after he heard the news on May 17, 1954.

  10. eugene57

    eugene57 said, about 15 hours ago

    Justice Clarence Thomas must dislike his wife as he seems to want the ruling that made it legal for them to marry, invalidated.

  11. TJ

    TJ said, about 15 hours ago

    If you like your Constitution you get to keep your Constitution…

  12. jack75287

    jack75287 said, about 14 hours ago

    It’s beginning to look that way.

  13. Bar Pluc

    Bar Pluc said, about 14 hours ago

    @Darth Vader

    The court has NO constitutional authority to interpret anything, there are to hear case “arising under this constitution” and NOTHING else related to domestic legislation. They are to measure a law against the clear and precise text of the Constitution without regard to ANY other issue.

  14. Bar Pluc

    Bar Pluc said, about 14 hours ago

    @3pibgorn9

    Can’t speak for the bible, but there is NO ’interpretation of the constitution, it is what it says it is and no more. The ONLY people wishing to create some ’interpretation of the Constitution are those wishing it said something it clearly does not say.
    .
    And Marshall was the first justice to drive the judiciary away from the clear and precise text of the Constitution.

  15. Bar Pluc

    Bar Pluc said, about 14 hours ago

    @echoraven

    no just the vast majority of rulings in the last 85 years.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (28).