F Minus by Tony Carrillo

F Minus

Comments (12) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. IamJayBluE

    IamJayBluE said, about 1 year ago

    What a sweet racket!…..

  2. INGSOC

    INGSOC GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    Obligations, obligations..

  3. Prof d'anglais

    Prof d'anglais said, about 1 year ago

    The first ones are free, after you have to pay through the nose.

  4. daDoctah

    daDoctah said, about 1 year ago

    Legally it doesn’t work that way. If you receive something you didn’t order and didn’t pay for, it’s yours to do with as you please.

  5. dukedoug

    dukedoug said, about 1 year ago

    @Prof d'anglais

    As long as you don’t have to eat them that way …

  6. Alexikakos

    Alexikakos said, about 1 year ago

    Caution!!! Strong language! (But still funny!)

    Link

  7. Alexikakos

    Alexikakos said, about 1 year ago

    @SavannahJack

    If they eat them, they’re obligated to pay the bill.

    They’re in no way obligated to take care of the cookies, and in fact may remove them from their property as an unwanted intrusion, but once they’ve eaten them, and thus accepted a benefit under the contract, the cookies must be paid for.

  8. Tom Falco

    Tom Falco said, about 1 year ago

    Now that’s a clever way to sell Girl Scout Cookies.

  9. DAZZ

    DAZZ GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    If they did that I’d be obliged to treat them just as I do all the mailing labels and such that come in the mail. I certainly would not encourage them by giving them anything (unless it is a charity I would otherwise support). And those excessively sweet cookies are horrid! Notepads and calendars large enough to schedule things on are the only things useful.

  10. DAZZ

    DAZZ GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    @Alexikakos

    Paid for by the willing recipient (who deposited them there). I believe the homeowner would still be under no obligation.

  11. hippogriff

    hippogriff said, about 1 year ago

    If reasonably undamaged, you can even charge storage costs.

  12. dukedoug

    dukedoug said, about 1 year ago

    @Alexikakos

    From my Aussie Contract Law studies (some time ago) I believe the correct term is “consideration”, not “benefit”.


    A legal contract comprises “an offer to treat”, “an acceptance of that offer” and “passing of consideration between the parties” – both ways.

  13. Refresh Comments.