Doonesbury by Garry Trudeau

Doonesbury

Comments (59) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. leftwingpatriot

    leftwingpatriot said, 4 months ago

    The “humanitarian convoy” from Russia is carrying guacamole and green salsa for the residents of Donetsk.

  2. moedred

    moedred said, 4 months ago

    Chipotle says “way overblown.”
    See you next week!
    http://articles.latimes.com/2014/mar/05/news/la-sh-chipotle-guacamole-20140305

  3. Thirdguy

    Thirdguy said, 4 months ago

    Yeah, but what about the sour cream and queso fresco? I heard that 90% of it will be half gone by 2034!

  4. DavidHuieGreen

    DavidHuieGreen said, 4 months ago

    I think it was North Dakota this past week where NPR said the more humid summers have made it harder to grow wheat, easier to grow corn.
    go with the flow (but not the floe, it’s melting)

  5. Night-Gaunt49

    Night-Gaunt49 said, 4 months ago

    Animals and plants have been found to be moving North. Or up mountains.

  6. dukedoug

    dukedoug said, 4 months ago

    @Thirdguy

    OMG … We’re approaching “peak sour cream” ???

  7. c.davies

    c.davies GoComics PRO Member said, 4 months ago

    @DavidHuieGreen

    Actually, the Arctic Ice has been increasing, not melting (or lessening). So going with the flow is a bit like trying to “save” the Polar Bear. Good Press, but not factual.

  8. c.davies

    c.davies GoComics PRO Member said, 4 months ago

    @God

    Don’t hate the environment, hate the alarmist groups. Our Earth is in pretty good shape, contrary to what a few “scientists” try to sell.

  9. Clark  Kent

    Clark Kent said, 4 months ago

    @c.davies,
    Right, sure, any day now.
    If you’ll excuse me I’m due back on the planet Earth.

  10. luvcmx

    luvcmx said, 4 months ago

    @c.davies

    What’s your definition of “a few”? 97%?

  11. jeffiekins

    jeffiekins said, 4 months ago

    @luvcmx

    The 97% supported by grants that only go to support a political agenda. Yes.
    .
    Ever notice that most of the scientists in the 3% are retired, or Physicists? That is, they don’t need grants, or their grants are for something completely different, so they can say what they like (believe).
    .
    After the IPCC released their preliminary “summary”, many of the scientists the IPCC listed as experts in the report asked to have their names removed from it. The IPCC refused, and kept their names on a politically-motivated report they could not, as scientists, keep their name on.
    .
    I would give a source, but you might not like it. Look it up yourself; it’s a simple fact. Or would you rather take the word of politicians (professional liars, both major parties), and people who majored in Journalism because they had a pretty face and weren’t smart enough to major in a science?

  12. Christopher Shea

    Christopher Shea said, 4 months ago

    @jeffiekins

    It takes a really … special … mind to think that 97% of all climate scientists are on the take. I mean, that’s a denial of reality on the order of believing the moon landings were staged.

  13. avtar123

    avtar123 said, 4 months ago

    @c.davies

    A few? How about 96%.

  14. wcorvi

    wcorvi said, 4 months ago

    The fact that the Koch Brothers made their billions in coal and oil couldn’t POSSIBLY be a factor in their support of no-global-warming, could it?

  15. loves raising duncan

    loves raising duncan said, 4 months ago

    No avocado?? Awwww…..

  16. Load 15 more comments. | Load the rest (44).