Darrin Bell by Darrin Bell

Darrin Bell

Comments (9) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, almost 3 years ago

    As Mossad has said, and I agree: if you allow them in the terminal, you’ve already screwed up! The TSA “security” model is typical U.S., expensive, but not well-designed. And it is NOT a “new” development!

  2. Tom from NC

    Tom from NC GoComics PRO Member said, almost 3 years ago

    With the number of guns in the US right now, getting rid of them is impossible. Our only choice is to focus on the people and we are doing a really lousy job of looking out and helping the people.

  3. chuckconly

    chuckconly said, almost 3 years ago

    I’m glad we don’t have the crime per person that England does! They eliminated the “Right of Self Defence” except for the Royals! There you are expected to syrrender to your murderer! If you “Hurt” him while he is killing you…YOU go to prison! Wonderful isn’t it? YOU can have it!

  4. Arnold Young

    Arnold Young GoComics PRO Member said, almost 3 years ago

    What?? like we have a guy that kills a home intruder and goes to jail for life. Like inEngland. Yeah we need that ok.

  5. Wherehavethetalentedartistsgone

    Wherehavethetalentedartistsgone said, almost 3 years ago

    Nitwits like you are why we won Olympic medals in the shooting sports and no one knows it.

  6. cjr53

    cjr53 said, almost 3 years ago

    Odd, they have funds to go out, leave a babysitter in charge without a phone, near the grandparents house where there is a phone AND have funds to buy a firearm with ammunition. Certainly different priorities from mine. Oh, that’s right, I’ve never been on watch where a 5 year old or anyone else was killed by a readily available gun, or any other means. Oh where oh where is the NRA when needed?

  7. cjr53

    cjr53 said, almost 3 years ago

    They obviously didn’t partake of the NRA safety course, or chose to ignore any lesson there. Why doesn’t the NRA offer to control nuts obtaining guns?

  8. cjr53

    cjr53 said, almost 3 years ago


    Because they don’t want the liability of what will, without a doubt, happen.

  9. DavidHuieGreen

    DavidHuieGreen said, almost 3 years ago

    “Hammers, axes and cars are not designed to kill as a primary function—-fire arms are. They have no other use.”
    And sometimes a person or thing needs to be killed.
    If someone you love is being attacked by someone with an axe, hammer, or any other tool — including gun, having a good tool on hand to kill him would be most beneficial.
    If I were a mad killer, I would use whatever tool best allowed me to kill.
    I am not a mad killer but recognize they exist.
    I do not care what tool they try to use to try to kill me.
    I DO care that they fail.
    Disarming me (if I were armed) won’t do it.
    Disarming him can’t be done in advance.
    Sometimes reality sucks but it’s all we got.

  10. Refresh Comments.