Dana Summers by Dana Summers

Dana Summers

Recommended

Comments (21) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Molon Labe

    Molon Labe said, about 1 year ago

    Can we please just behead the bastard? 15 seconds on the guillotine and justice is served.

  2. Michael wme

    Michael wme said, about 1 year ago

    The first version was that 15 Saudis met in Saudi. Then they went to Dubai and recruited four more Arabs. Then they went to Germany. Then to London. And finally to the US.


    Factual, but inconvenient, so dismissed with extreme prejudice.


    New version: the 19 hijackers went to Pakistan. They were innocents, and devoutly devoted to the US, but Khalid Sheikh Mohammed corrupted them (this must be true, he confessed under ‘enhanced interrogation’). Also, Osama. From the Pakistan/Afghanistan border, they flew directly into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and a field in Pennsylvania.


    Do you want facts, or the story the Ministry of Truth tells? Well of course, you want the Ministry of Truth version, they have exclusive rights to the Truth, and it don’t need no stinkin’ facts!

  3. Tigger

    Tigger GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    The Muslim

  4. mikefive

    mikefive said, about 1 year ago

    A sad point is being made by Dana.

  5. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    Dana may want to review the “Patriot” and “Military Commissions” Acts. Written, pushed, and passed, by Republicans, with threats of “treason” launched against any Democrat who spoke against those acts.

  6. Rad-ish

    Rad-ish GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    Drone strikes in Pakistan are the best recruiting device Islam ever had.

  7. Adrian Snare

    Adrian Snare said, about 1 year ago

    @Molon Labe

    NO, it is NOT “justice”, it is revenge.
    Why is it that conservatives must live in the past.
    It is what makes them conservative..

  8. Adrian Snare

    Adrian Snare said, about 1 year ago

    @Michael wme

    I trust your version least of all, and our governments version the most.
    But, sadly, there is NO 100% trust.
    Adrian

  9. Wraithkin

    Wraithkin said, about 1 year ago

    @dtroutma

    It doesn’t change the fact that under W, no American Citizen was killed/assassinated. The two acts to which you are referencing did not authorize the killing of US Citizens without trial. Even those who are caught killing 25 people get a trial. What O has done is an impeachable offense by violating the 5th Amendment. If W had done this, Congress would have been calling for his resignation. Yet people are eerily silent.

  10. Ionizer

    Ionizer said, about 1 year ago

    @dtroutma

    “Dana may want to review the “Patriot” and “Military Commissions” Acts. Written, pushed, and passed, by Republicans, with threats of “treason” launched against any Democrat who spoke against those acts.”

    Trout, I’ve believed from the start that the Patriot (sic) Act was wrong. Are you willing to say that Obama is wrong for doing things similar to what others have done using the PA as justification? I doubt it, because the Messiah can do no wrong.

    Saying “He hit me first” probably didn’t work when you were a child, and it’s even dumber as an adult. Quit being a hypocrite.

  11. pirate227

    pirate227 said, about 1 year ago

    It’s almost a credible argument when the US citizen is a faceless, nameless person. Dana should have provided an actual accused terrorist that is a US citizen for a fair comparison but, that would lead to examining what the person has done…

  12. dannysixpack

    dannysixpack said, about 1 year ago

    @wraitkin

    come on, it’s inflamatory. it doesn’t matter if he was an american citizen or not. he made war against the us from and on foreign soil. constitutional rights apply where the constitution applies, not on foreign soil.

    what about the hundreds of thousands of innocents killed by the usa as ‘collateral damage’? they have constitutional rights too?

  13. dannysixpack

    dannysixpack said, about 1 year ago

    ^the US constitution does not apply to people outside its jurisdiction.

  14. omQ Release the Desaparecidos

    omQ Release the Desaparecidos said, about 1 year ago

    @Wraithkin

    American rights are were more important than anyone else’s. Now extrajudial executions are for everyone.


    @Danny6pack : ‘what about the hundreds of thousands of innocents killed by the usa as ‘collateral damage’? they have constitutional rights too?’
    Thanks for bringing that up and pointing it out.

  15. dannysixpack

    dannysixpack said, about 1 year ago

    @Dr Canuck
    it depends on the frame of the discussion. are we talking idealist, are we talking pragmatic, are we talking legally or are we talking about how it really works

    with respect to rights, there are inalienable rights that come from our creator (they are birthright passed down from our parents, NOT the great spaghetti monster in the sky), there are defined rights, like the right to bear arms which seem to be granted by SOME governments.

    There is a specific difference between rights GRANTED by governments and rights NOT TAKEN by governments. For example, george bush took away inalienable rights with his patriot act – such as the right to peacably assemble. The supremes took away the inalienable right to shout ‘fire’ in a crowded theater that is not on fire.

    and finally let’s remember the USA is an experiment in inalienable rights. other countries that HAVE a sovereign, like amsterdam and england (and i believe canada) derive their social contract and legitimacy from the devine rights of kings, and therefore all of the rights of the people are granted by those governments.

    so as i said, the constitution only extends and was only intended to extend within the territories of the USA. People outside our borders DO NOT HAVE constitutional rights.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (6).