Dana Summers by Dana Summers

Dana Summers

Comments (25) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. greyolddave

    greyolddave said, almost 4 years ago

    Yes, America is the candy store for those who want to kill people. The vendors are happy to assist.

  2. zoidknight

    zoidknight said, almost 4 years ago

    Fine ban firearms, but everytime someone is killed in a violent crime or home invasion after taking away our ability to defend ourselves, which will happen, you anti-gun nuts should be prosecuted for being an accessory to the crime.

  3. ossiningaling

    ossiningaling said, almost 4 years ago


    That is completely fair. I accept your terms. In the meantime, you should be prosecuted and held liable for ALL crimes committed with guns!

  4. Troy Young

    Troy Young said, almost 4 years ago

    My guns, even the “evil, black” ones, will NEVER be used to “assault” anyone, unless they are entering my home with intent to do harm to my family or me, or to steal from me. I work hard for my money; not only would someone be stealing “things”, but they would be stealing the time I put in at work to own those “things”, thus they would be stealing my life. Not gonna happen on my watch.

  5. midaswelby

    midaswelby said, almost 4 years ago

    We’re being lectured on guns by people who don’t know a clip from a magazine.

  6. ARodney

    ARodney said, almost 4 years ago

    Nobody wants your stuff that bad, Troy. You are forty-three times more likely to be killed with that weapon in your home than you are to kill an intruder. Just pointing out the statistics. Nancy Lanza was not an outlying data point.

  7. Bruce4671

    Bruce4671 said, almost 4 years ago

    Really? Go here:



    Just don’t buy the cheap stuff from Russia because most gun ranges don’t want you to shoot it. The bullets are made with some scrap metal and they shred up the backstops. Other than that it’s good ammo.

  8. The Wolf In Your Midst

    The Wolf In Your Midst said, almost 4 years ago

    @Troy Young

    I won’t argue against the right to defense of home and self. But tell me- what sort of home-defense scenario can you describe to me that requires an automatic or semi-auto rifle with a 30-round magazine? Are there roving bands of criminals decked out in MIL-SPEC body armor that I’m not aware of? And if those rifles were properly stored- either in a gun safe or a locked rack, unloaded- then how could they be accessed in the short amount of time between entry and encounter?
    If I owned rifles of that nature (not beyond the realm of possibility; I’ll freely admit that taking them down to the range would be a load of fun), I’d be absolutely paranoid about keeping them as INaccesible as possible- preferably off-site in a dependable, protected armory- and keep something more accessible and less dangerous for home protection, like a .40S&W handgun or a .38 revolver. The only logical rationale I can see for keeping multiple rifles “ready to go” is for use against multiple individuals wearing anti-ballistic armor… like law-enforcement officers.

  9. disgustedtaxpayer

    disgustedtaxpayer said, almost 4 years ago

    facts and statistics=
    any weapon is an “assault weapon”
    the 10 year “assault ban” that ended in 2004 got congressionl testimony from law enforcement leaders/agencies that “we do not need that ban which was ineffective…the crime rate using guns did not go down under the ban.”
    some leftwing brains are allergic to guns which were used to create the USA in 1776 and which are used to defend and maintain our freedoms.
    an example of the Bullies on the Left is CNN’s Pier Morgan, who had no factual answers to Larry Pratt, and on world TV, Morgan threw a 3rd-grade hissy fit of name-calling his CNN guest. Morgan should be sent on mental-health leave from anchoring a TV program, IMO.

  10. Garitheous

    Garitheous said, almost 4 years ago

    Really, you are going to throw Video Games in there? Add television shows, movies, board games, role playing games, books, the bible, and the news in there too!

  11. disgustedtaxpayer

    disgustedtaxpayer said, almost 4 years ago

    standing on their record of the People’s Republic of China founded by Mao Zedong on the bodies of the estimated
    40 million to 70 million killed by their government by starvation, executions and re-education camps, has gone on record worldwide …“The Official Chinese government news agency Xinhua has demanded that the US immediately adopt stricter gun control measures to reduce the number of firearms the US populace is permitted to possess.”
    (all Totalitarians want an UNarmed populace)
    ever notice that mass murderers PLAN the day and time and select a GUN FREE LOCATION to attack and kill innocents?

  12. angusdad

    angusdad said, almost 4 years ago

    Wasn’t his mother a gun owner, and if so, why wasn’t she able to defend herself with her own guns?

  13. comicstome

    comicstome said, almost 4 years ago

    REAL GUN CONTROL NOW. Don"t let the Gun Nuts win this time.

  14. Ken M

    Ken M GoComics PRO Member said, almost 4 years ago

    You left out, media hype, hollywood movies, television violence, no accountability, facts and a few more.

  15. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, almost 4 years ago

    If Alexander Hamilton had just had a MAC – 10, he might, might, maybe, have been able to hit Burr first and won the duel.

    BTW, naval ships and forts have “magazines” to store ammunition, sem-auto pistols, and M-16s etc, still have “clips”, even if they aren’t the original brass slides used with the M-1 Garand. The interchangeable words don’t change the fact that these devices hold bullets to feed the chamber of a weapon, and the more they hold, the more people who can be killed with a single loading of the weapon.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (10).