Dana Summers by Dana Summers

Dana Summers

Comments (34) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. greyolddave

    greyolddave said, over 1 year ago

    Yes, America is the candy store for those who want to kill people. The vendors are happy to assist.

  2. zoidknight

    zoidknight said, over 1 year ago

    Fine ban firearms, but everytime someone is killed in a violent crime or home invasion after taking away our ability to defend ourselves, which will happen, you anti-gun nuts should be prosecuted for being an accessory to the crime.

  3. ossiningaling

    ossiningaling said, over 1 year ago

    @zoidknight

    That is completely fair. I accept your terms. In the meantime, you should be prosecuted and held liable for ALL crimes committed with guns!

  4. Troy Young

    Troy Young said, over 1 year ago

    My guns, even the “evil, black” ones, will NEVER be used to “assault” anyone, unless they are entering my home with intent to do harm to my family or me, or to steal from me. I work hard for my money; not only would someone be stealing “things”, but they would be stealing the time I put in at work to own those “things”, thus they would be stealing my life. Not gonna happen on my watch.

  5. midaswelby

    midaswelby said, over 1 year ago

    We’re being lectured on guns by people who don’t know a clip from a magazine.

  6. ARodney

    ARodney said, over 1 year ago

    Nobody wants your stuff that bad, Troy. You are forty-three times more likely to be killed with that weapon in your home than you are to kill an intruder. Just pointing out the statistics. Nancy Lanza was not an outlying data point.

  7. Bruce4671

    Bruce4671 GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    @russell5419

    Really? Go here:

    ammoman.com

    sportsmansguide.com

    Just don’t buy the cheap stuff from Russia because most gun ranges don’t want you to shoot it. The bullets are made with some scrap metal and they shred up the backstops. Other than that it’s good ammo.

  8. TheTrustedMechanic

    TheTrustedMechanic GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    @zoidknight

    NO ONE IS CALLING TO BAN ALL FIREARMS!!!!
    Typical zoidy ignorance and bluster.

  9. TheTrustedMechanic

    TheTrustedMechanic GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    @Ms. Ima

    I think someone hacked your account, you’re making sense.

  10. The Wolf In Your Midst

    The Wolf In Your Midst GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    @Troy Young

    I won’t argue against the right to defense of home and self. But tell me- what sort of home-defense scenario can you describe to me that requires an automatic or semi-auto rifle with a 30-round magazine? Are there roving bands of criminals decked out in MIL-SPEC body armor that I’m not aware of? And if those rifles were properly stored- either in a gun safe or a locked rack, unloaded- then how could they be accessed in the short amount of time between entry and encounter?
    If I owned rifles of that nature (not beyond the realm of possibility; I’ll freely admit that taking them down to the range would be a load of fun), I’d be absolutely paranoid about keeping them as INaccesible as possible- preferably off-site in a dependable, protected armory- and keep something more accessible and less dangerous for home protection, like a .40S&W handgun or a .38 revolver. The only logical rationale I can see for keeping multiple rifles “ready to go” is for use against multiple individuals wearing anti-ballistic armor… like law-enforcement officers.

  11. disgustedtaxpayer

    disgustedtaxpayer said, over 1 year ago

    facts and statistics=
    any weapon is an “assault weapon”
    the 10 year “assault ban” that ended in 2004 got congressionl testimony from law enforcement leaders/agencies that “we do not need that ban which was ineffective…the crime rate using guns did not go down under the ban.”
    -
    some leftwing brains are allergic to guns which were used to create the USA in 1776 and which are used to defend and maintain our freedoms.
    -
    an example of the Bullies on the Left is CNN’s Pier Morgan, who had no factual answers to Larry Pratt, and on world TV, Morgan threw a 3rd-grade hissy fit of name-calling his CNN guest. Morgan should be sent on mental-health leave from anchoring a TV program, IMO.

  12. denis1112

    denis1112 said, over 1 year ago

    @ossiningaling

    Start with the Taliban shooting classrooms full of girls.Prosecute them.Not much better in Iran,They persicute women that wear underwear.Then every drug user in the United States,they are responsible for thousands and thousands of deaths.Then Obama and Eric Holder for sending “assault” rifles to Mexico where thousands have been killed so dope heads in the USA can get high.Don’t say that Bush started that either.Under Bush the Mexican government was in the loop,ther were tracking devices in the guns,over 1400 thugs were arrested.None of that took place under Obama.

  13. TheTrustedMechanic

    TheTrustedMechanic GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    @Troy Young

    You a patently false in your claim, you can’t guarantee that your weapons will never be used to assault anyone. Under the premise of gun-rights nuts if you secure you guns so you have total control of them and no one can get unauthorized access to them then you won’;t have them available to defend your family, your life and your property. No if you follow that mantra and have them ready and available to defend against an intruder then they can not be locked in a safe nor can they be secured with a trigger lock or some other extraneous safety measure.
    So according to the typical tripe from the gun advocates you either have them secured so you can guarantee that they will not be used in an unauthorized manner to assault someone. Or you have them out, open and ready to use and at that point you can’t guarantee that they will not be stolen or misused by an opportunistic individual.


    I’m sorry but according to the gun nuts you can’t have it both ways. But for those who want reasonable and responsible gun regulations and responsible gun ownership you can have both. So in which camp do you fall, reasonable and responsible (agreed not all those proposed are) gun controls or unfettered gun access and ownership?

  14. TheTrustedMechanic

    TheTrustedMechanic GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    @HOWGOZIT

    Do you ever have any thought deeper than your toilet bowl? All you do is cast dispersions upon others with your (you think clever) one-liners.


    But the FACT that you don’t dispute what your attack target wrote with any credibility or integrity is very telling of your position and opinions – no foundation.

  15. Mhic Dhu Ghaill

    Mhic Dhu Ghaill GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    @TheTrustedMechanic

    YET.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (19).