Ted Rall for May 04, 2012

  1. Missing large
    mimismom  almost 12 years ago

    And this is different from staying in Korea, Japan, Germany etc?

     •  Reply
  2. Birthcontrol
    Dtroutma  almost 12 years ago

    We still occupy Guantanamo, and that’s been since the Spanish American War! (Well, we still have Guam too.) The deal is only for “financial” on the extended period. Hey, give Romney a chance and we may be in Iran too!!

     •  Reply
  3. Klinger1
    walruscarver2000  almost 12 years ago

    I’ve warned you repeatedly about talking sense on this site. Cease at once.

     •  Reply
  4. 100 1176
    Lavocat  almost 12 years ago

    It already is.

    Only now do we come to realize that there was another word in front of “hopenchange”.

    The word?

    “No.”

     •  Reply
  5. Anger
    grumpypophobart  almost 12 years ago

    By crikey Clark Kent, I like your thinking!!

     •  Reply
  6. Scullyufo
    ScullyUFO  almost 12 years ago

    Every one of your policies will definitely not help the rich get richer. Plus, you used the word “union”.

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    rarmai  almost 12 years ago

    Its getting time to print the, “If you can read this bumper sticker thank a teacher. If you’re not reading it in Dari or Pashto thank a troop.”

     •  Reply
  8. 11 06 126
    Varnes  almost 12 years ago

    You mean like republicans hate women? No one hates the rich, but we have bridges falling down, roads and sewers, and schools to fix and nobody else has any money. ’Bout time they pony up….

     •  Reply
  9. Missing large
    joe vignone  almost 12 years ago

    Obama, you idiot! I didn’t vote for you to stay at war for years to come. Get the hell out before one more soldier is shot in the back by one of our Afghan allies!

     •  Reply
  10. Cowboyonhorse2
    Gypsy8  almost 12 years ago

    You must be a conservative. I heard on Talk-Radio today that the liberals want America to fail, and what you are advocating the country will not fail, in fact it will bloom.

     •  Reply
  11. U joes mint logo rs 192x204
    Uncle Joe Premium Member almost 12 years ago

    We really shouldn’t have any troops in Europe at this point. With the downfall of the Soviet Union, the threat of a massive land war is very small. The Europeans can pay for their own defense at this point.

    We do need to maintain a presence in the Pacific and East Asia, or the Chinese would dominate it’s neighbors, not to mention the regime in North Korea.

    Afghanistan is not going to be changed by a military occupation. There are no massive armies there and no staunch allies to work with us. We need some presence in order to make sure Al-Qaeda doesn’t resume training. But while we focus so much attention in Afghanistan, there are other places around the glove where terrorists of all stripes are relatively unchecked. The war on terrorism is not a war that should have been fought with our regular military.

     •  Reply
  12. Jollyroger
    pirate227  almost 12 years ago

    That would only be 23 years, a mere pittance for the American empire.

     •  Reply
  13. Missing large
    Bilword  almost 12 years ago

    gotta stay, it’s strategic for israel

     •  Reply
  14. Klinger1
    walruscarver2000  almost 12 years ago

    Better than theT Party line of “Hurrah for me and F*** you”.

     •  Reply
  15. Holyrat100
    Anarcissie  almost 12 years ago

    Afghanistan helped to destroy many an empire, most recently the Soviet Union. It’s been a long haul but…. one to go.

     •  Reply
  16. Missing large
    mjnyc  almost 12 years ago

    Is the Latin cross on the gravestone appropriate here?

     •  Reply
  17. Lew. shaved beard jul 11
    leweclectic  almost 12 years ago

    For once you got it right. The best thing America could and can do is let those Islamic bastards kill themselves off that we can go in and finish the job down to last little screaming infant.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Ted Rall