Pat Oliphant for October 13, 2009

He’s still looking for Mecca

First time a someone was awarded the Peace prize for what they may accomplish.

Sour Grapes!!!!!

Internal Satellite Navigation ?

Yep, the Libs sure like to see someone get something for nothing unless of course, it’s a CEO or the like.

magnaut that was sleazy.

jmworacle not sure that’s true. This prize of all the Nobels has its own unique set of rules that take into consideration the potential as well as what’s already been done. Not saying I agree, but then it’s not my award to give.

nomad you show here that you have no idea. Something for nothing is not a liberal hallmark – that’s republican. Or maybe it’s neither, and stupid things like saying one group wants something for nothing just doesn’t belong in the conversation at all. After all, each can point to their own illustrations of the principal. The right points to poor folks who have nothing and get help from the government. The left points to the obscenely rich who make rules to avoid paying - and who get even more government money.

Thank you, cd.

Does Pat have something clever on the back of the medal?

As I have said before, you have to give the Republicans credit: their ALWAYS ATTACK policy works.

Instead of talking about the issues - the wars, health care, the economy – they get people talking about this instead.

Why not talk about the fact the Republicans have no plans, no policy, and no program except to attack and say NO.

Yes this was silly, but give him credit because he has said this is kind of embarassing.

Looks to me like it says “09 NOBEL GONG” on there. Is that clever? If it is, I don’t get it.

He should melt it down and pay off some of that national debt.

Only place in the world where the leader has to do damage control for winning the Nobel Peace Prize.