Dana Summers for December 21, 2017

Sadly he won, ranting and screaming is a waste of effort. That said, the first four panels remain accurate.

We’re not just ranting at the sky: we’re calling our representatives, we’re fielding anfunding candidates who are the antithesis of Trumplethinskin, and are winning!

Have there ever been sorer winners than those who worship at Trump’s throne?

now I know what mamabear2012 look like !!

More Hillary derangement syndrome.

Jesus said, feed the poor, heal the sick.

Anti-Christ Republicans say, take away their food stamps, and health care and give the money to the rich.

@NOTSUFFERINGFOOLSATALL and @CRITTER’S GRANNY — It isn’t so much that Snopes has a liberal bias, as it is that facts have a liberal bias. This is particularly true for those who live in a bubble and refuse to believe anything that disagrees with their preconceived opinions. .

As demonstrated, true Fools show themselves sans self-awareness.

Look, I never wanted Hillary to win in the first place, And you know what? Trump is unfit for office, a fool, possibly a traitor, probably insane. Hillary has nothing to do with any of that. But you keep pretending that we somehow care about her and sooner or later your editor is going to realize what a hack you are. You better wake up and look at today’s headlines, instead of going on about Hillary “Never Will be President” Clinton.

So true, Hillary won the popular vote, but the Republicans need handicaps to win – so with Russia’s help, we have a mentally unfit, cray, demented, not all there resident who just shifted more money to the haves so your paycheck can go up $5 to pay for the $50 increase in everything. Is it great yet?

More of that strange, right-wing populist, psycho-sexual fascination with da Hilster.