Jen Sorensen for August 01, 2017

  1. Missing large
    WaitingMan  almost 7 years ago

    Looks like socialism to me. Seeing how I’ve voted for Socialist Party candidates on numerous occasions (the last one was Brian Moore, 2008. Obama was too conservative for me.), I’m all right with that.

     •  Reply
  2. Great view up here
    comixbomix  almost 7 years ago

    Nice to see Mitch McConnell taking time out for a swim!

     •  Reply
  3. Missing large
    benjamineyal  almost 7 years ago

    dunno. Socialism and capitalism are mixed. I’d say that we’d be moving closer to socialism, but that isn’t socialism- its a mixed economy

     •  Reply
  4. Wtp
    superposition  almost 7 years ago

    How about a plan that deals with issues that we the people are concerned about and the parties have been avoiding?

    http://www.businessinsider.com/climate-change-earth-two-degrees-warming-2100-new-studies-2017-7

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/12/27/the-u-s-spends-more-on-health-care-than-any-other-country-heres-what-were-buying/?utm_term=.058fe47af979

     •  Reply
  5. Image 2023 09 27 151840085
    Striped Cat  almost 7 years ago

    We already have a “You don’t die agenda”. First you love Jesus. Second, Jesus gives you material wealth for worshiping Him. Third, that wealth just may include healthcare. Welcome to the “Prosperity Gospel” of Christian Values America!

     •  Reply
  6. Penguin hero
    grainpaw  almost 7 years ago

    Belief in an imaginary sky friend isn’t the answer.

     •  Reply
  7. Agent gates
    Radish the wordsmith  almost 7 years ago

    The dems should take a Single Payer stand.

     •  Reply
  8. Albert einstein brain i6
    braindead Premium Member almost 7 years ago

    Better Deal?

    Wasn’t that already taken when Bibi raged against the Iran nuke deal?

     •  Reply
  9. Picture
    Sadandconfused9  almost 7 years ago

    Actually our forefathers wanted a free market Society and the government to keep their hands off thinking that it would level itself out by itself. Which could be true but the collateral damage is pretty ugly.

     •  Reply
  10. Bill
    Mr. Blawt  almost 7 years ago

    If we do what is in the last panel, we get the rest of the panels.

     •  Reply
  11. Picture
    MartinKilgore  almost 7 years ago

    I’m a retired RN. The Teamsters and the UAW secured primo health insurance for their members. This strip is feeding you a lie about unions.

     •  Reply
  12. Missing large
    twclix  almost 7 years ago

    @mikefive…the belief in religious precepts as promulgated by revelatory texts and organized religion is unsupported by evidence. The belief in the scientific method is all about examaning the evidence to understand the phenomenon.

    The empirical method tries to overcome “faith-based answers” while religion embraces those “answers.” Religion focuses on the unverifiable and belivers rely instead on a leap of baseless faith.

    Science is terribly effective when applied consistently. Religion can never be shown to be effective, its effectiveness has to be taken on faith with no consistent web of causality to be teased out of the data and replicated for verification. Huge difference in the belief sets and the precepts that support the scientific method as compared to the religious experience.

     •  Reply
  13. Img 20230721 103439220 hdr
    kaffekup   almost 7 years ago

    He’s not an actual senator, either.

     •  Reply
  14. 15337488 1147011182082780 6096345719805271081 n
    jmusich1 Premium Member almost 7 years ago

    They had the audacity to call it rise. Language appropriators. Ish

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Jen Sorensen