Michael Ramirez for June 14, 2017

First Sessions lied to Congress about having “encounters” with the Ruskies before the election and now he refuses to answer any questions at all before Congress. Could he have made himself look any guiltier? Just because he is willing to go to prison for his boss doesn’t mean there isn’t any evidence.

Nothing will convince – or even sway – the DT cult followers. Perception is in the eye of the beholder.

I really don’t know too many people who think that there was a sophisticated collusion operation between Russia and the Trump campaign. We know Russia interfered in our Democracy and we know that for some reason they preferred that Trump defeat Hillary Clinton. That’s enough reason in itself to have a thorough investigation. But coordination? Nothing about the Trump Administration says they are capable of sophisticated levels of coordination on anything.

It’s a photo of Jeff Sessions in a white parka talking to a polar bear in a blizzard! IMPEACH!!!

I thought it was a picture of Trump’s innocence.

Trump now at 60% disapproval in Gallup poll. Obama never reached 60% disapproval, Trump reached it faster than any other president.

There are none so blind as those who will not draw.

Correct title should be "The s0-called mind of a Republican.

The only “Russian” collusion was hacking Hillary’s illegal server in her bathroom. The group may be Russian who did it. Personally, I wish that they would release the emails they did not hand over to WikiLeaks. This is garbage & everybody knows it. No evidence for 11 months now. Dems simply cannot accept that their candidate lost, even after the DNC rigged the game against Bernie Sanders. What a bunch of brainless lemmings. All of this is a waste of taxpayer monies, & is nothing but grandstanding on the part of the Dems. I am curious, though, why it was OK for Obama to interfere & support opposition groups in Israel during their election to obtain the outcome they wanted. Hmmmmm?

Golly. Someone mislabeled the caption. It should say "Credible evidence of Republican innocence of collusion. "

Yeah, Kushner met with Russians to compare borscht recipes!

“Yes, sir. There should be no fuzz on this whatsoever. The Russians interfered in our election during the 2016 cycle. They did with purpose. They did it with sophistication. They did it with overwhelming technical efforts. It was an active measures campaign driven from the top of that government. There is no fuzz on that. It is a high confidence judgment of the entire intelligence community and the members of this committee have seen the intelligence. It’s not a close call. "

Sessions: I don’t recall. I may have.

didn’t Trump publicly plead and encourage the Russians to hack Hillary Clinton’s emails. Pretty sure he did. Ooooo. just imagine if Hillary “nut cracker” Clinton did the same – i mean she is a “nasty woman”. Can we at least spend as much time on this as Republicans in Congress did on Hillary Clinton’s emails?

That looks more like Sessions’ testimony. “I don’t recall”, “I can’t talk about that” I suppose that is enough for Ramirez when it comes to the presidents who are the right color.

Let’s see: Trump advizor, Roger Stone admitted to conversing with both Gucifer 2.0 and Julian Assange and posted “Podesta’s turn in the barrel” in advance of the leaking of Podesta’s e-mails. Trump campaign manager Manafort worked for the former Ukraine President and Michael Flynn worked with RT Television, which is an arm of the Russian government…

Michael just painted all the “white lies” thrown at us by all the Trumpies.

Poor Michael Ramirez. In a rule of law country investigators are tasked with uncovering the evidence and prosecuting. It is not the responsibility of a political party to do so.

Ramirez NAILED IT!