The founders envisioned a congress that would reconcile their differences and work in the best interests of “we the people” , not “we the political parties” , “we the corporations” or “we the wealthy” and would select unbiased judges by consensus not by a history of judgments that matched the sentiments of the house majority.
superposition about 7 years ago
The founders envisioned a congress that would reconcile their differences and work in the best interests of “we the people” , not “we the political parties” , “we the corporations” or “we the wealthy” and would select unbiased judges by consensus not by a history of judgments that matched the sentiments of the house majority.
Motivemagus about 7 years ago
This is a very, very, very dangerous precedent. And it will come back to bite people. As it has the American people.
julie.mason1 Premium Member about 7 years ago
Wait! There is an election in 43 months. Shouldn’t the person elected in 2020 get to fill the seat on the Court?
Mr. Blawt about 7 years ago
Gorsuch is a poor replacement for Garland, but the GOP couldn’t stand by while a black man got his way.